State of Maharashtra thr. Pl. St. Radhanagari vs Amol Ramchandra Powar Advocate - S. R. Bhandigare — 11/2024
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 324,323,504,506,427,34. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 16th March 2026.
R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case
CNR: MHKO190000512024
Filing Number
26/2024
Filing Date
23-01-2024
Registration No
11/2024
Registration Date
24-01-2024
Court
Civil and Criminal Court , Radhanagari
Judge
5-Jt. CJJD and JMFC Radhanagari
Decision Date
16th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
184
Police Station
Radhanagari Polilce Station
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra thr. Pl. St. Radhanagari
Adv. A. P. P.
Respondent(s)
Amol Ramchandra Powar Advocate - S. R. Bhandigare
Ramchandra Sakharam Powar
Hearing History
Judge: 5-Jt. CJJD and JMFC Radhanagari
Disposed
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 06-03-2026 | Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C. |
| 25-02-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 02-01-2026 | Evidence |
| 11-11-2025 | Evidence |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Amol Ramchandra Powar & Ramchandra Sakharam Powar (Case 11/2024) The First Class Judicial Magistrate Court at Radhanagari acquitted both accused of charges under IPC Sections 324, 323, 504, 506, 427, and 34. The prosecution failed to establish its case beyond reasonable doubt through witness testimony. Despite allegations of assault with a wooden stick causing injuries to the complainant's father and other family members, the court found insufficient corroborating evidence to prove the criminal charges. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Amol Ramchandra Powar & Ramchandra Sakharam Powar (Case 11/2024) The First Class Judicial Magistrate Court at Radhanagari acquitted both accused of charges under IPC Sections 324, 323, 504, 506, 427, and 34. The prosecution failed to establish its case beyond reasonable doubt through witness testimony. Despite allegations of assault with a wooden stick causing injuries to the complainant's father and other family members, the court found insufficient corroborating evidence to prove the criminal charges. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts