Pravin Namdev Dhavan vs Pralhad Baburao Dhavan Advocate - S. P. Wagvekar — 11/2026

Case under Specific Relief Act Section 34,37. Status: Issues. Next hearing: 04th August 2026.

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHKO190000372026

Issues

Next Hearing

04th August 2026

e-Filing Number

13-01-2026

Filing Number

7/2026

Filing Date

16-01-2026

Registration No

11/2026

Registration Date

20-01-2026

Court

Civil and Criminal Court , Radhanagari

Judge

5-Jt. CJJD and JMFC Radhanagari

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section 34,37

Petitioner(s)

Pravin Namdev Dhavan

Adv. D. M. Potdar

Mahesh Namdeo Dhavan

Adv. D. M. Potdar

Eknath Atmaram Dhavan

Adv. D. M. Potdar

Damodar Atmaram Dhavan

Adv. D. M. Potdar

Balwant Atmaram Dhavan

Adv. D. M. Potdar

Prakash Dinkar Dhavan

Adv. D. M. Potdar

Vilas Shankar Dhavan

Adv. D. M. Potdar

Respondent(s)

Pralhad Baburao Dhavan Advocate - S. P. Wagvekar

Ramesh Baburao Dhavan

Suresh Baubrao Dhavan

Ananda Dattatray Dhavan

Adv. R. D. Khade

Ganapati Bhau Dhavan

Tukaram Krushna Gaikwad

Hearing History

Judge: 5-Jt. CJJD and JMFC Radhanagari

23-04-2026

Issues

15-04-2026

Order on Exh

08-04-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

25-03-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

13-03-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

Interim Orders

21-01-2026

Order on Exhibit

23-04-2026
Order on T.I.

Case Summary: The court rejected the plaintiffs' application for temporary injunction seeking to restrain the defendants from obstructing their peaceful possession of agricultural properties (Block Nos. 502-507) in Naratawade village, Kolhapur district. The court found that the plaintiffs failed to establish a prima facie case of possession, as the defendants' long-standing revenue records (7/12 extracts from 1971 onwards) clearly indicated their continuous possession, while the plaintiffs produced no contemporaneous documentary evidence and delayed challenging the revenue entries. Consequently, the temporary injunction application was dismissed with no order as to costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: The court rejected the plaintiffs' application for temporary injunction seeking to restrain the defendants from obstructing their peaceful possession of agricultural properties (Block Nos. 502-507) in Naratawade village, Kolhapur district. The court found that the plaintiffs failed to establish a prima facie case of possession, as the defendants' long-standing revenue records (7/12 extracts from 1971 onwards) clearly indicated their continuous possession, while the plaintiffs produced no contemporaneous documentary evidence and delayed challenging the revenue entries. Consequently, the temporary injunction application was dismissed with no order as to costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil and Criminal Court , Radhanagari All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case