State of Maharashtra vs Aditya Sukumar Sidnale — 79/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 303(2),3(5). Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 16th March 2026.
R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case
CNR: MHKO180008952025
Filing Number
615/2025
Filing Date
26-12-2025
Registration No
79/2025
Registration Date
26-12-2025
Court
Civil and Criminal Court , Kurundwad
Judge
3-Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Kurundwad
Decision Date
16th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
243
Police Station
Kurundwad Police Station
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra
Adv. A. P. P.
Respondent(s)
Aditya Sukumar Sidnale
Jaywardhan Alies Sarjerao Ravindra Kamble
Hearing History
Judge: 3-Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Kurundwad
Disposed
Notice_Unready
Notice_Unready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 26-02-2026 | Notice_Unready |
| 13-01-2026 | Notice_Unready |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary of Case 79/2025 - State of Maharashtra v. Aditya Sukumar Sidnale and Jaywardhan Alies Sarjerao Ravindra Kamble Decision: The court acquitted both accused Aditya Sukumar Sidnale and Jaywardhan (alias Sarjerao Ravindra Kamble) under IPC sections 303(2) and 3(5), finding insufficient evidence to prove the theft of a buffalo beyond reasonable doubt. The prosecution failed to establish a prima facie case as the sole witness (complainant) refused to cooperate, and no corroborating evidence was presented. Key Reasoning: The complainant withdrew cooperation with the prosecution and claimed an out-of-court settlement with the accused. The prosecution presented no substantive witness testimony or direct/indirect evidence linking the accused to the alleged theft. Applying the principle of benefit of doubt, the court found the charges unproven beyond reasonable suspicion. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary of Case 79/2025 - State of Maharashtra v. Aditya Sukumar Sidnale and Jaywardhan Alies Sarjerao Ravindra Kamble Decision: The court acquitted both accused Aditya Sukumar Sidnale and Jaywardhan (alias Sarjerao Ravindra Kamble) under IPC sections 303(2) and 3(5), finding insufficient evidence to prove the theft of a buffalo beyond reasonable doubt. The prosecution failed to establish a prima facie case as the sole witness (complainant) refused to cooperate, and no corroborating evidence was presented. Key Reasoning: The complainant withdrew cooperation with the prosecution and claimed an out-of-court settlement with the accused. The prosecution presented no substantive witness testimony or direct/indirect evidence linking the accused to the alleged theft. Applying the principle of benefit of doubt, the court found the charges unproven beyond reasonable suspicion. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts