State Of Maharashtra Inspector State Excise Squad 1 Kolhapur vs Ananda Kallappa Bhat — 449/2025

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(E),90,103. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 20th March 2026.

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHKO180008712025

Case disposed

Filing Number

600/2025

Filing Date

23-12-2025

Registration No

449/2025

Registration Date

23-12-2025

Court

Civil and Criminal Court , Kurundwad

Judge

3-Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Kurundwad

Decision Date

20th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

FIR Details

FIR Number

49

Police Station

Excise Office Kolhapur.

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

MAHARASHTRA PROHIBITION ACT Section 65(E),90,103

Petitioner(s)

State Of Maharashtra Inspector State Excise Squad 1 Kolhapur

Adv. A. P. P.

Respondent(s)

Ananda Kallappa Bhat

Hearing History

Judge: 3-Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Kurundwad

20-03-2026

Disposed

16-03-2026

Evidence

18-02-2026

Evidence

12-02-2026

Notice_Unready

16-01-2026

Notice_Unready

Final Orders / Judgements

20-03-2026
Copy of Judgment

Summary of Case 449/2025 The court acquitted respondent Ananda Kallappa Bhat of charges under the Maharashtra Excise Act, 1949, Section 65(E), finding that the State failed to prove the allegations beyond reasonable doubt. Although the prosecution presented witness testimony from a panchnama witness (Ravindra), the court noted critical gaps in evidence: the chemical analysis report was not submitted to conclusively establish that the seized bottles contained liquor, and other key witnesses were not examined, leaving substantial doubt about the seizure and its contents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case 449/2025 The court acquitted respondent Ananda Kallappa Bhat of charges under the Maharashtra Excise Act, 1949, Section 65(E), finding that the State failed to prove the allegations beyond reasonable doubt. Although the prosecution presented witness testimony from a panchnama witness (Ravindra), the court noted critical gaps in evidence: the chemical analysis report was not submitted to conclusively establish that the seized bottles contained liquor, and other key witnesses were not examined, leaving substantial doubt about the seizure and its contents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil and Criminal Court , Kurundwad All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case