Suhas Shivaji Jadhav @ Patil vs Ranjitsign Vasantrao Patil Advocate - D. D. Magdum — 196/2019
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 39. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 03rd July 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHKO180008412019
Next Hearing
03rd July 2026
Filing Number
295/2019
Filing Date
21-12-2019
Registration No
196/2019
Registration Date
21-12-2019
Court
Civil and Criminal Court , Kurundwad
Judge
7-Jt. Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Kurundwad.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Suhas Shivaji Jadhav @ Patil
Adv. R. J. gorwade
Respondent(s)
Ranjitsign Vasantrao Patil Advocate - D. D. Magdum
Randhir Vasantrao Patil
Hearing History
Judge: 7-Jt. Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Kurundwad.
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-06-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 04-05-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 16-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 19-01-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 23-12-2025 | Evidence Part Heard |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: Reg. Civil Suit No. 196/2019 The defendants' application to set aside the "No Cross" order was allowed. The court found that while defendants failed to cross-examine the plaintiff's witness despite multiple opportunities, they did not act intentionally. The "No Cross" order was set aside subject to defendants paying costs of Rs. 1,000 to the plaintiff as compensation for the delay caused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Reg. Civil Suit No. 196/2019 The defendants' application to set aside the "No Cross" order was allowed. The court found that while defendants failed to cross-examine the plaintiff's witness despite multiple opportunities, they did not act intentionally. The "No Cross" order was set aside subject to defendants paying costs of Rs. 1,000 to the plaintiff as compensation for the delay caused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts