State Of Maharashtra Inspector State Excise Squad 1 Kolhapur vs Santosh Sanjay Kamble — 421/2025
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e). Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 20th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHKO180008122025
Filing Number
562/2025
Filing Date
26-11-2025
Registration No
421/2025
Registration Date
26-11-2025
Court
Civil and Criminal Court , Kurundwad
Judge
3-Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Kurundwad
Decision Date
20th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
55
Police Station
Excise Office Kolhapur.
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State Of Maharashtra Inspector State Excise Squad 1 Kolhapur
Adv. A. P. P.
Respondent(s)
Santosh Sanjay Kamble
Hearing History
Judge: 3-Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Kurundwad
Disposed
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 20-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 16-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 18-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 12-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 05-02-2026 | Evidence |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Santosh Sanjay Kamble (Case 421/2025) The court acquitted Santosh Sanjay Kamble of charges under the Maharashtra Excise Act, 1949, Section 65(E), finding that the prosecution failed to establish its case beyond reasonable doubt. The key weakness was that while the excise officials seized alleged country liquor from the accused's possession, the chemical analysis report could not definitively confirm whether the seized material was actually illicit liquor, creating reasonable doubt about the core charge. Additionally, the prosecution failed to produce several key witnesses whose testimony was essential to prove the offense. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Santosh Sanjay Kamble (Case 421/2025) The court acquitted Santosh Sanjay Kamble of charges under the Maharashtra Excise Act, 1949, Section 65(E), finding that the prosecution failed to establish its case beyond reasonable doubt. The key weakness was that while the excise officials seized alleged country liquor from the accused's possession, the chemical analysis report could not definitively confirm whether the seized material was actually illicit liquor, creating reasonable doubt about the core charge. Additionally, the prosecution failed to produce several key witnesses whose testimony was essential to prove the offense. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts