State Of Maharashtra Inspector State Excise Squad 1 Kolhapur vs Jayashri Pramod Minekar — 417/2025

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(E),90,103. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 20th March 2026.

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHKO180008032025

Case disposed

Filing Number

558/2025

Filing Date

21-11-2025

Registration No

417/2025

Registration Date

24-11-2025

Court

Civil and Criminal Court , Kurundwad

Judge

3-Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Kurundwad

Decision Date

20th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

FIR Details

FIR Number

50

Police Station

Excise Office Kolhapur.

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

MAHARASHTRA PROHIBITION ACT Section 65(E),90,103

Petitioner(s)

State Of Maharashtra Inspector State Excise Squad 1 Kolhapur

Adv. A. P. P.

Respondent(s)

Jayashri Pramod Minekar

Hearing History

Judge: 3-Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Kurundwad

20-03-2026

Disposed

16-03-2026

Evidence

18-02-2026

Evidence

12-02-2026

Evidence

21-01-2026

Evidence

Final Orders / Judgements

20-03-2026
Copy of Judgment

Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Jayashri Pramod Minekar (417/2025) The court acquitted the respondent, Jayashri Pramod Minekar, of charges under the Maharashtra Excise Act, 1949, Section 65(E), finding that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. Although the prosecution presented witness testimony regarding seizure of alleged illicit liquor, a critical gap existed: a chemical analysis report could not definitively establish that the seized material was actually country-made liquor, leaving substantial doubt about the core allegation. The court concluded that without concrete forensic confirmation, the prosecution's circumstantial evidence was insufficient to secure conviction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Jayashri Pramod Minekar (417/2025) The court acquitted the respondent, Jayashri Pramod Minekar, of charges under the Maharashtra Excise Act, 1949, Section 65(E), finding that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. Although the prosecution presented witness testimony regarding seizure of alleged illicit liquor, a critical gap existed: a chemical analysis report could not definitively establish that the seized material was actually country-made liquor, leaving substantial doubt about the core allegation. The court concluded that without concrete forensic confirmation, the prosecution's circumstantial evidence was insufficient to secure conviction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil and Criminal Court , Kurundwad All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case