Rekha Dilip Shinde vs Ananda Gundu Harane Advocate - A. D. Kamble — 195/2022
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 34. Status: Order on Exh. Next hearing: 17th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHKO180007982022
Next Hearing
17th June 2026
Filing Number
302/2022
Filing Date
01-11-2022
Registration No
195/2022
Registration Date
21-11-2022
Court
Civil and Criminal Court , Kurundwad
Judge
3-Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Kurundwad
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Rekha Dilip Shinde
Adv. P. R. Bhendwade
Alka Alias Suman Rangrao Patil
Respondent(s)
Ananda Gundu Harane Advocate - A. D. Kamble
Krishnabai Ananda Harne
Netaji Sakharam Dinde
Sambhaji Sakharam Dinde
Surekha Sarjerao More
Housabai Ganpati More
Ramchandra Gundu Harne(Legal Heir)
Hindurao Gundu Harne
Shivaji Krishna Nirmal
Dilip Krishna Nirmale
Vilas Krishna Nirmale
Vimal Raghunath More
Hearing History
Judge: 3-Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Kurundwad
Order on Exh
Order on Exh
Order on Exh
Order on Exh
Order on Exh
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 09-06-2026 | Order on Exh |
| 08-05-2026 | Order on Exh |
| 05-05-2026 | Order on Exh |
| 29-04-2026 | Order on Exh |
| 22-04-2026 | Order on Exh |
Interim Orders
Case 195/2022 Summary: The court allowed the plaintiffs' application to amend the plaint, correcting a typographical error where R.C.S. No.76/2003 was incorrectly mentioned instead of R.C.S. No.73/2003. The court found the amendment formal in nature, not altering the suit's character (partition, declaration, and perpetual injunction), and causing no prejudice to defendants. Plaintiffs were directed to file the corrected plaint before the next hearing date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case 195/2022 Summary: The court allowed the plaintiffs' application to amend the plaint, correcting a typographical error where R.C.S. No.76/2003 was incorrectly mentioned instead of R.C.S. No.73/2003. The court found the amendment formal in nature, not altering the suit's character (partition, declaration, and perpetual injunction), and causing no prejudice to defendants. Plaintiffs were directed to file the corrected plaint before the next hearing date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts