Rajendra Pandurang Jadhav-Patil vs Dipak Pandurang Jadhav-Patil Advocate - P. R. Bhendwade — 179/2024
Case under Hindu Succession Act Section 6,8. Status: Argument on Exh.____Unready. Next hearing: 03rd July 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHKO180007922024
Next Hearing
03rd July 2026
e-Filing Number
25-09-2024
Filing Number
257/2024
Filing Date
14-10-2024
Registration No
179/2024
Registration Date
16-10-2024
Court
Civil and Criminal Court , Kurundwad
Judge
7-Jt. Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Kurundwad.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Rajendra Pandurang Jadhav-Patil
Adv. R. J. Gorwade
Respondent(s)
Dipak Pandurang Jadhav-Patil Advocate - P. R. Bhendwade
Gita Kamal Rana
Suresh Manohar Patil
Hearing History
Judge: 7-Jt. Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Kurundwad.
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-06-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 04-05-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 16-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 19-01-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 23-12-2025 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: Civil Suit No. 179/2024 Defendant No.1 (Dipak Pandurang Jadhav-Patil) filed an application to set aside a "No Written Statement/Say" order passed against him for failing to file his Written Statement within the stipulated period. The court found that while the defendant had ample opportunities to file, he was prevented by sufficient cause (being out of station for work). Applying principles of natural justice, the court allowed the application and set aside the No Written Statement Order, subject to the defendant paying Rs. 300/- in costs to the plaintiff. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Civil Suit No. 179/2024 Defendant No.1 (Dipak Pandurang Jadhav-Patil) filed an application to set aside a "No Written Statement/Say" order passed against him for failing to file his Written Statement within the stipulated period. The court found that while the defendant had ample opportunities to file, he was prevented by sufficient cause (being out of station for work). Applying principles of natural justice, the court allowed the application and set aside the No Written Statement Order, subject to the defendant paying Rs. 300/- in costs to the plaintiff. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts