State of Maharashtra vs Namadev Sanbhaji Shikalgar Advocate - V. L. Jamadagni — 59/2023
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 324,323,143,147,149,504. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 24th April 2026.
R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case
CNR: MHKO180006812023
Filing Number
428/2023
Filing Date
05-09-2023
Registration No
59/2023
Registration Date
06-09-2023
Court
Civil and Criminal Court , Kurundwad
Judge
3-Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Kurundwad
Decision Date
24th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
12
Police Station
Kurundwad Police Station
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra
Adv. A. P. P.
Respondent(s)
Namadev Sanbhaji Shikalgar Advocate - V. L. Jamadagni
Tushar Namadev Shikalgar
Ashok Sanbhaji Shikalgar
Umesh Arjun Shikalgar
Kedar Namadev Shikalagar
Sudhir Ashok Shikalagar
Hearing History
Judge: 3-Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Kurundwad
Disposed
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 24-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 10-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 16-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 10-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 07-02-2026 | Evidence |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Namadev Sanbhaji Shikalgar & Others (Case 59/2023) Court Decision: The court acquitted all six accused under IPC sections 143, 147, 323, 324, and 504 read with section 149. The prosecution failed to establish the charges, as key witnesses (the complainant and injury witnesses) did not provide credible evidence supporting the allegations of unlawful assembly and rioting. Key Reasoning: Despite prosecution witnesses being examined, they failed to corroborate the allegations. The complainant and witnesses either lacked sufficient knowledge of the incident or claimed they were not properly questioned by investigating officers. The prosecution presented no substantive, direct evidence to prove the accused participated in the alleged unlawful assembly or committed the violent acts described in the complaint. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Namadev Sanbhaji Shikalgar & Others (Case 59/2023) Court Decision: The court acquitted all six accused under IPC sections 143, 147, 323, 324, and 504 read with section 149. The prosecution failed to establish the charges, as key witnesses (the complainant and injury witnesses) did not provide credible evidence supporting the allegations of unlawful assembly and rioting. Key Reasoning: Despite prosecution witnesses being examined, they failed to corroborate the allegations. The complainant and witnesses either lacked sufficient knowledge of the incident or claimed they were not properly questioned by investigating officers. The prosecution presented no substantive, direct evidence to prove the accused participated in the alleged unlawful assembly or committed the violent acts described in the complaint. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts