State of Maharashtra vs Namadev Sanbhaji Shikalgar Advocate - V. L. Jamadagni — 59/2023

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 324,323,143,147,149,504. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 24th April 2026.

Case disposed

R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case

CNR: MHKO180006812023

Filing Number

428/2023

Filing Date

05-Sep-2023

Registration No

59/2023

Registration Date

06-Sep-2023

Court

Civil and Criminal Court , Kurundwad

Judge

3-Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Kurundwad

Decision Date

24-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

Last updated 15-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

12

Police Station

Kurundwad Police Station

Year

2023

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 324,323,143,147,149,504

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra

    Adv. A. P. P.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Namadev Sanbhaji Shikalgar Advocate - V. L. Jamadagni

  2. 2.Tushar Namadev Shikalgar

  3. 3.Ashok Sanbhaji Shikalgar

  4. 4.Umesh Arjun Shikalgar

  5. 5.Kedar Namadev Shikalagar

  6. 6.Sudhir Ashok Shikalagar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Apr-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Namadev Sanbhaji Shikalgar & Others (Case 59/2023) Court Decision: The court acquitted all six accused under IPC sections 143, 147, 323, 324, and 504 read with section 149. The prosecution failed to establish the charges, as key witnesses (the complainant and injury witnesses) did not provide credible evidence supporting the allegations of unlawful assembly and rioting. Key Reasoning: Despite prosecution witnesses being examined, they failed to corroborate the allegations. The complainant and witnesses either lacked sufficient knowledge of the incident or claimed they were not properly questioned by investigating officers. The prosecution presented no substantive, direct evidence to prove the accused participated in the alleged unlawful assembly or committed the violent acts described in the complaint. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 24-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Kurundwad

  4. 10-Apr-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Kurundwad

  5. 16-Mar-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Kurundwad

  6. 10-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Kurundwad

  7. 07-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Kurundwad

  8. 28-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Kurundwad

  9. 10-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Kurundwad

  10. 07-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Kurundwad

  11. 10-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Kurundwad

  12. 15-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Kurundwad

  13. 02-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Kurundwad

  14. 21-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Kurundwad

  15. 04-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Kurundwad

  16. 28-Apr-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Kurundwad

  17. 26-Mar-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Kurundwad

  18. 15-Feb-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Kurundwad

  19. 13-Jan-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Kurundwad

  20. 09-Dec-2024

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Kurundwad

  21. 07-Nov-2024

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Kurundwad

  22. 19-Sep-2024

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Kurundwad

  23. 19-Aug-2024

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Kurundwad

  24. 26-Jul-2024

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Kurundwad

  25. 15-Jul-2024

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Kurundwad

  26. 20-Jun-2024

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Kurundwad

  27. 13-May-2024

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Kurundwad

  28. 27-Feb-2024

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Kurundwad

  29. 12-Jan-2024

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Kurundwad

  30. 15-Dec-2023

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Kurundwad

  31. 27-Oct-2023

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Kurundwad

  32. 07-Sep-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  33. 05-Sep-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 59/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Namadev Sanbhaji Shikalgar & Others (Case 59/2023) Court Decision: The court acquitted all six accused under IPC sections 143, 147, 323, 324, and 504 read with section 149. The prosecution failed to establish the charges, as key witnesses (the complainant and injury witnesses) did not provide credible evidence supporting the allegations of unlawful assembly and rioting. Key Reasoning: Despite prosecution witnesses being examined, they failed to corroborate the allegations. The complainant and witnesses either lacked sufficient knowledge of the incident or claimed they were not properly questioned by investigating officers. The prosecution presented no substantive, direct evidence to prove the accused participated in the alleged unlawful assembly or committed the violent acts described in the complaint. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case