State of Maharashtra vs Guru Ramesh Shikalgar Advocate - Imran J. Ghori, S. S. Kumbhar, S. S. KumbharS. S. Kumbhar, — 57/2023

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 143,147,149,324,323,336,337,504. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 24th April 2026.

Case disposed

R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case

CNR: MHKO180006712023

Filing Number

418/2023

Filing Date

02-Sep-2023

Registration No

57/2023

Registration Date

02-Sep-2023

Court

Civil and Criminal Court , Kurundwad

Judge

3-Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Kurundwad

Decision Date

24-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

Last updated 15-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

14

Police Station

Kurundwad Police Station

Year

2023

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 143,147,149,324,323,336,337,504

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra

    Adv. A. P. P.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Guru Ramesh Shikalgar Advocate - Imran J. Ghori, S. S. Kumbhar, S. S. KumbharS. S. Kumbhar,

  2. 2.Sanjay Ramesh Shikalgar

    Adv. S. S. Kumbhar

  3. 3.Pankag Ramesh Shikalgar

  4. 4.Rakesh Shivappa Shikalgar

  5. 5.Anil Raju Shikalgar

  6. 6.Parashuram @ Prakash Abdul Shikalgar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Apr-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Guru Ramesh Shikalgar & Others (Case 57/2023) Court Decision: The First Class Judicial Magistrate acquitted all five accused (Guru Ramesh Shikalgar, Pankaj Ramesh Shikalgar, Rakesh Shivappa Shikalgar, Anil Raju Shikalgar, and Purshuram Prakash Abdul Shikalgar) of charges under IPC sections 143, 147, 323, 324, 336, 337, and 504 with section 149, finding insufficient evidence to prove the alleged unlawful assembly and rioting case. Key Reasoning: The prosecution witnesses (complainant and injured parties) failed to provide credible, substantive evidence despite testifying. They collaborated in submitting a joint settlement petition outside court, undermining the prosecution's case. The court found no conclusive proof connecting the accused to the alleged violent incident from January 15, 2023. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 24-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Kurundwad

  4. 10-Apr-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Kurundwad

  5. 16-Mar-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Kurundwad

  6. 10-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Kurundwad

  7. 07-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Kurundwad

  8. 28-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Kurundwad

  9. 31-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Kurundwad

  10. 10-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Kurundwad

  11. 07-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Kurundwad

  12. 10-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Kurundwad

  13. 16-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Kurundwad

  14. 02-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Kurundwad

  15. 21-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Kurundwad

  16. 24-Jun-2025

    Charge

    Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Kurundwad

  17. 08-May-2025

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  18. 08-May-2025

    Charge

    Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Kurundwad

  19. 27-Mar-2025

    Charge

    Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Kurundwad

  20. 27-Feb-2025

    Charge

    Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Kurundwad

  21. 29-Jan-2025

    Charge

    Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Kurundwad

  22. 08-Jan-2025

    Charge

    Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Kurundwad

  23. 18-Dec-2024

    Charge

    Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Kurundwad

  24. 07-Nov-2024

    Charge

    Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Kurundwad

  25. 19-Sep-2024

    Charge

    Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Kurundwad

  26. 19-Aug-2024

    Charge

    Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Kurundwad

  27. 26-Jul-2024

    Charge

    Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Kurundwad

  28. 29-May-2024

    Charge

    Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Kurundwad

  29. 15-Apr-2024

    Charge

    Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Kurundwad

  30. 30-Jan-2024

    Charge

    Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Kurundwad

  31. 15-Dec-2023

    Charge

    Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Kurundwad

  32. 20-Oct-2023

    Awaiting Summons

    Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Kurundwad

  33. 04-Sep-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  34. 02-Sep-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 57/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Guru Ramesh Shikalgar & Others (Case 57/2023) Court Decision: The First Class Judicial Magistrate acquitted all five accused (Guru Ramesh Shikalgar, Pankaj Ramesh Shikalgar, Rakesh Shivappa Shikalgar, Anil Raju Shikalgar, and Purshuram Prakash Abdul Shikalgar) of charges under IPC sections 143, 147, 323, 324, 336, 337, and 504 with section 149, finding insufficient evidence to prove the alleged unlawful assembly and rioting case. Key Reasoning: The prosecution witnesses (complainant and injured parties) failed to provide credible, substantive evidence despite testifying. They collaborated in submitting a joint settlement petition outside court, undermining the prosecution's case. The court found no conclusive proof connecting the accused to the alleged violent incident from January 15, 2023. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case