State of Maharashtra vs Guru Ramesh Shikalgar Advocate - Imran J. Ghori, S. S. Kumbhar, S. S. KumbharS. S. Kumbhar, — 57/2023
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 143,147,149,324,323,336,337,504. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 24th April 2026.
R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case
CNR: MHKO180006712023
Filing Number
418/2023
Filing Date
02-09-2023
Registration No
57/2023
Registration Date
02-09-2023
Court
Civil and Criminal Court , Kurundwad
Judge
3-Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Kurundwad
Decision Date
24th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
14
Police Station
Kurundwad Police Station
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra
Adv. A. P. P.
Respondent(s)
Guru Ramesh Shikalgar Advocate - Imran J. Ghori, S. S. Kumbhar, S. S. KumbharS. S. Kumbhar,
Sanjay Ramesh Shikalgar
Adv. S. S. Kumbhar
Pankag Ramesh Shikalgar
Rakesh Shivappa Shikalgar
Anil Raju Shikalgar
Parashuram @ Prakash Abdul Shikalgar
Hearing History
Judge: 3-Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Kurundwad
Disposed
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 24-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 10-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 16-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 10-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 07-02-2026 | Evidence |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Guru Ramesh Shikalgar & Others (Case 57/2023) Court Decision: The First Class Judicial Magistrate acquitted all five accused (Guru Ramesh Shikalgar, Pankaj Ramesh Shikalgar, Rakesh Shivappa Shikalgar, Anil Raju Shikalgar, and Purshuram Prakash Abdul Shikalgar) of charges under IPC sections 143, 147, 323, 324, 336, 337, and 504 with section 149, finding insufficient evidence to prove the alleged unlawful assembly and rioting case. Key Reasoning: The prosecution witnesses (complainant and injured parties) failed to provide credible, substantive evidence despite testifying. They collaborated in submitting a joint settlement petition outside court, undermining the prosecution's case. The court found no conclusive proof connecting the accused to the alleged violent incident from January 15, 2023. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Guru Ramesh Shikalgar & Others (Case 57/2023) Court Decision: The First Class Judicial Magistrate acquitted all five accused (Guru Ramesh Shikalgar, Pankaj Ramesh Shikalgar, Rakesh Shivappa Shikalgar, Anil Raju Shikalgar, and Purshuram Prakash Abdul Shikalgar) of charges under IPC sections 143, 147, 323, 324, 336, 337, and 504 with section 149, finding insufficient evidence to prove the alleged unlawful assembly and rioting case. Key Reasoning: The prosecution witnesses (complainant and injured parties) failed to provide credible, substantive evidence despite testifying. They collaborated in submitting a joint settlement petition outside court, undermining the prosecution's case. The court found no conclusive proof connecting the accused to the alleged violent incident from January 15, 2023. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts