Sindhu Maruti Salunkhe vs Shamrao Ganapati Sawant Advocate - M. S. Kulkarni — 188/2016
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 52. Status: Hearing. Next hearing: 17th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHKO180005742016
Next Hearing
17th June 2026
Filing Number
304/2016
Filing Date
26-10-2016
Registration No
188/2016
Registration Date
26-10-2016
Court
Civil and Criminal Court , Kurundwad
Judge
3-Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Kurundwad
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sindhu Maruti Salunkhe
Adv. B. R. Kumbhar
Respondent(s)
Shamrao Ganapati Sawant Advocate - M. S. Kulkarni
Vishnu Ganpati Sawant
Sitabai Ramchandra Sawant
Shobha Ramesh Shinde
Chaya Sunil Mane
Radhabai Krishna Sawant
Rajendra Krishna Sawant
Jayshree Shrikant Shelar
Sakhubai Gopal Bhosale
Kashibai Kallappa Suryavanshi
Indubai Baburao Pattekari
Sanjay Ramchandra Sawant
Hearing History
Judge: 3-Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Kurundwad
Hearing
Hearing
Hearing
Hearing
Hearing
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 18-04-2026 | Hearing |
| 16-03-2026 | Hearing |
| 07-02-2026 | Hearing |
| 16-01-2026 | Hearing |
| 10-12-2025 | Hearing |
Interim Orders
Case 188/2016 Summary: Petitioner Sindhu Maruti Salunkhe sought correction of a name in legal proceedings. The court found that Defendant No. 10 was incorrectly named as 'Kashibai' when the correct name is 'Rathnabai,' and approved the formal correction. The court granted permission for the amendment and dismissed the respondents' objection filed under Order 19. The petition was allowed with directions to correct the defendant's name in the original record, dated 23/08/2017. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case 188/2016 Summary: Petitioner Sindhu Maruti Salunkhe sought correction of a name in legal proceedings. The court found that Defendant No. 10 was incorrectly named as 'Kashibai' when the correct name is 'Rathnabai,' and approved the formal correction. The court granted permission for the amendment and dismissed the respondents' objection filed under Order 19. The petition was allowed with directions to correct the defendant's name in the original record, dated 23/08/2017. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts