Appasaheb Gangaram Mahar vs Babasaheb Krishanrao Pol Advocate - V. L. Jamadagni — 1900218/2014
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section ??. Status: Steps. Next hearing: 22nd June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHKO180005492014
Next Hearing
22nd June 2026
Filing Number
1900400/2014
Filing Date
08-10-2014
Registration No
1900218/2014
Registration Date
09-10-2014
Court
Civil and Criminal Court , Kurundwad
Judge
3-Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Kurundwad
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Appasaheb Gangaram Mahar
Adv. B. R. Kumbhar
Mahadev Prabhu Mahar
Adv. B. R. Kumbhar
Krishana Prabhu Mahar
Adv. B. R. Kumbhar
Anjana Prabhu MaharRepresented by Power of Attorney -Mahavir Narasappa Mahar
Adv. B. R. Kumbhar
Respondent(s)
Babasaheb Krishanrao Pol Advocate - V. L. Jamadagni
Hearing History
Judge: 3-Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Kurundwad
Steps
Steps
Steps
Steps
Steps
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 24-04-2026 | Steps |
| 01-04-2026 | Steps |
| 16-03-2026 | Steps |
| 13-02-2026 | Steps |
| 02-02-2026 | Steps |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: 1900218/2014 The court allowed the plaintiffs' application to condone the delay in bringing on record the legal heirs of deceased plaintiff No.1 (who died on 12.08.2018). The court found sufficient cause for the delay, noting it was not deliberate and necessary to proceed with the suit on merit. However, the court imposed costs of Rs. 1,500 payable to defendants as a condition precedent for the condonation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 1900218/2014 The court allowed the plaintiffs' application to condone the delay in bringing on record the legal heirs of deceased plaintiff No.1 (who died on 12.08.2018). The court found sufficient cause for the delay, noting it was not deliberate and necessary to proceed with the suit on merit. However, the court imposed costs of Rs. 1,500 payable to defendants as a condition precedent for the condonation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts