Amol Deogonda Patil vs Devgonda Balgonda Patil Advocate - T. B. Patil — 131/2023

Case under Hindu Succession Act Section 6. Status: Steps. Next hearing: 30th July 2026.

Steps Next hearing 30-Jul-2026 this date has passed

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHKO180004262023

Filing Number

184/2023

Filing Date

19-Jun-2023

Registration No

131/2023

Registration Date

07-Jul-2023

Court

Civil and Criminal Court , Kurundwad

Judge

3-Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Kurundwad

Last updated 15-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Hindu Succession Act Section 6

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Amol Deogonda Patil

    Adv. V. S. Sutar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Devgonda Balgonda Patil Advocate - T. B. Patil

  2. 2.Bharti Deogonda Patil

Case History

  1. 30-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 08-Jun-2026

    Steps

    Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Kurundwad

  3. 13-Apr-2026

    Steps

    Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Kurundwad

  4. 16-Mar-2026

    Steps

    Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Kurundwad

  5. 07-Feb-2026

    Steps

    Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Kurundwad

  6. 05-Jan-2026

    Steps

    Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Kurundwad

  7. 06-Dec-2025

    Steps

    Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Kurundwad

  8. 24-Nov-2025

    Steps

    Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Kurundwad

  9. 10-Nov-2025

    Steps

    Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Kurundwad

  10. 06-Oct-2025

    Steps

    Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Kurundwad

  11. 15-Sep-2025

    Steps

    Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Kurundwad

  12. 25-Aug-2025

    Steps

    Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Kurundwad

  13. 11-Aug-2025

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Case Summary: 131/2023 Petitioner: Amol Deogonda Patil Respondents: Devgonda Balgonda Patil and others Outcome: The court ALLOWED the petitioner's application to correct omissions in the original suit regarding property details (survey number and boundaries). The petitioner was required to pay ₹500 as costs to the respondents, and must file the corrected plaint within the next date of hearing along with copies for all parties. The court found the correction necessary for proper adjudication and determined that granting the amendment would cause no prejudice to respondents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  14. 11-Aug-2025

    Steps

    Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Kurundwad

  15. 21-Jul-2025

    Summons_Ready

    Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Kurundwad

  16. 18-Jun-2025

    Summons_Ready

    Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Kurundwad

  17. 21-Apr-2025

    Summons_Ready

    Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Kurundwad

  18. 12-Mar-2025

    Summons_Ready

    Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Kurundwad

  19. 03-Feb-2025

    Hearing

    Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Kurundwad

  20. 06-Jan-2025

    Hearing

    Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Kurundwad

  21. 18-Nov-2024

    Hearing

    Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Kurundwad

  22. 04-Nov-2024

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  23. 04-Nov-2024

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  24. 04-Nov-2024

    Hearing

    Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Kurundwad

  25. 21-Oct-2024

    Hearing

    Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Kurundwad

  26. 01-Oct-2024

    Hearing

    Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Kurundwad

  27. 27-Aug-2024

    Hearing

    Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Kurundwad

  28. 13-Aug-2024

    Hearing

    Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Kurundwad

  29. 06-Jul-2024

    Ex_Party Hearing

    Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Kurundwad

  30. 20-Apr-2024

    Ex_Party Hearing

    Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Kurundwad

  31. 02-Feb-2024

    Ex_Party Hearing

    Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Kurundwad

  32. 05-Jan-2024

    Ex_Party Hearing

    Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Kurundwad

  33. 09-Nov-2023

    Ex_Party Hearing

    Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Kurundwad

  34. 29-Sep-2023

    Reply/Say

    Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Kurundwad

  35. 18-Aug-2023

    Reply/Say

    Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Kurundwad

  36. 14-Jul-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  37. 19-Jun-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 131/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 131/2023 Petitioner: Amol Deogonda Patil Respondents: Devgonda Balgonda Patil and others Outcome: The court ALLOWED the petitioner's application to correct omissions in the original suit regarding property details (survey number and boundaries). The petitioner was required to pay ₹500 as costs to the respondents, and must file the corrected plaint within the next date of hearing along with copies for all parties. The court found the correction necessary for proper adjudication and determined that granting the amendment would cause no prejudice to respondents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case