Ravikant Parappa Karadage vs Appaso Gangaram Waghmare Advocate - B. R. Kumbhar — 148/2017
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 38. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 08th July 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHKO180003682017
Next Hearing
08th July 2026
Filing Number
216/2017
Filing Date
27-06-2017
Registration No
148/2017
Registration Date
27-06-2017
Court
Civil and Criminal Court , Kurundwad
Judge
3-Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Kurundwad
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Ravikant Parappa Karadage
Adv. A. V. Jamadagni
Respondent(s)
Appaso Gangaram Waghmare Advocate - B. R. Kumbhar
Hearing History
Judge: 3-Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Kurundwad
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 11-06-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 06-05-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 16-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 02-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 16-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: 148/2017 Outcome: Petition dismissed. The court found that petitioner Ravikant Parappa Karadage failed to establish primary ownership of the disputed agricultural land (Plot No. 987). The court upheld respondent Appaso Gangaram Waghmare's ownership rights and granted an injunction restraining the petitioner from obstructing the respondent's possession and enjoyment of the property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 148/2017 Outcome: Petition dismissed. The court found that petitioner Ravikant Parappa Karadage failed to establish primary ownership of the disputed agricultural land (Plot No. 987). The court upheld respondent Appaso Gangaram Waghmare's ownership rights and granted an injunction restraining the petitioner from obstructing the respondent's possession and enjoyment of the property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts