Nandini Dipak Deshamane vs Jabbar Sikandar Nalband Advocate - A. D. Kallannawar — 89/2022
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 20. Status: Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready. Next hearing: 06th July 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHKO180003452022
Next Hearing
06th July 2026
Filing Number
134/2022
Filing Date
30-04-2022
Registration No
89/2022
Registration Date
04-05-2022
Court
Civil and Criminal Court , Kurundwad
Judge
3-Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Kurundwad
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Nandini Dipak Deshamane
Adv. A. V. Jamadagni
Respondent(s)
Jabbar Sikandar Nalband Advocate - A. D. Kallannawar
Hearing History
Judge: 3-Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Kurundwad
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-06-2026 | Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready |
| 21-04-2026 | Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready |
| 06-04-2026 | Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready |
| 16-03-2026 | Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready |
| 23-02-2026 | Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready |
Interim Orders
Case 89/2022 Summary Nandini Dipak Deshamane v. Jabbar Sikandar Nalband Advocate - A.D. Kallannawar The petitioner's application to correct a typographical error in the suit (date wrongly entered as 27.04.2016 instead of 27.04.2013 in paragraph 1) was allowed with costs. The court granted the application to permit the necessary correction in the suit document and directed the petitioner to file the corrected pleading within the specified time. The petitioner was ordered to pay ₹500 as costs to the respondent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case 89/2022 Summary Nandini Dipak Deshamane v. Jabbar Sikandar Nalband Advocate - A.D. Kallannawar The petitioner's application to correct a typographical error in the suit (date wrongly entered as 27.04.2016 instead of 27.04.2013 in paragraph 1) was allowed with costs. The court granted the application to permit the necessary correction in the suit document and directed the petitioner to file the corrected pleading within the specified time. The petitioner was ordered to pay ₹500 as costs to the respondent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts