Gunandhar Chandrappa Neje vs Shridhar Chandrappa Neje Advocate - Shital D. Patil — 57/2025
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 38. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 22nd June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHKO180003242025
e-Filing Number
05-04-2025
Filing Number
79/2025
Filing Date
05-Apr-2025
Registration No
57/2025
Registration Date
05-Apr-2025
Court
Civil and Criminal Court , Kurundwad
Judge
3-Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Kurundwad
Last updated 15-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Gunandhar Chandrappa Neje
Adv. A. D. Kallannawar, S. A. Kallannawar
Respondent(s)
-
1.Shridhar Chandrappa Neje Advocate - Shital D. Patil
Case History
-
22-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
15-Apr-2026
Evidence
Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Kurundwad
-
16-Mar-2026
Evidence
Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Kurundwad
-
04-Feb-2026
Evidence
Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Kurundwad
-
09-Jan-2026
Evidence
Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Kurundwad
-
07-Jan-2026
Dismissal Order
Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Kurundwad
-
03-Dec-2025
Evidence
Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Kurundwad
-
05-Nov-2025
Evidence
Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Kurundwad
-
24-Sep-2025
Evidence
Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Kurundwad
-
30-Aug-2025
Evidence
Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Kurundwad
-
23-Jul-2025
Evidence
Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Kurundwad
-
19-Jun-2025
Order on T.I.View PDF
Case Summary: R.C.S. No. 57/2025 Court Decision: The temporary injunction application was rejected. Key Facts: Gunandhar Chandrappa Neje (plaintiff) sought to restrain his brother Shridhar Chandrappa Neje (defendant) from constructing on adjacent land in Dattawad village, Kolhapur, claiming encroachment on his 3.77 Are property. The defendant argued the ancestral land was partitioned between them in 2007 and he was building only on his own allocated portion. Grounds for Rejection: The court found the plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case, failed to show balance of convenience in his favor, and would not suffer irreparable loss. Key issues included: the plaintiff suppressed facts about property area increasing from 3.375 to 3.77 Are without explanation; the defendant's construction was completed to lintel level with substantial investment; and credible witness affidavits supported the defendant's partition claim. Both parties bear their own costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
19-Jun-2025
Evidence
Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Kurundwad
-
12-Jun-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Kurundwad
-
30-May-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Kurundwad
-
09-May-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Kurundwad
-
05-May-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Kurundwad
-
02-May-2025
Summons_Ready
Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Kurundwad
-
23-Apr-2025
Summons_Ready
Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Kurundwad
-
17-Apr-2025
Summons_Ready
Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Kurundwad
-
07-Apr-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
05-Apr-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 57/2025
Case Summary: R.C.S. No. 57/2025 Court Decision: The temporary injunction application was rejected. Key Facts: Gunandhar Chandrappa Neje (plaintiff) sought to restrain his brother Shridhar Chandrappa Neje (defendant) from constructing on adjacent land in Dattawad village, Kolhapur, claiming encroachment on his 3.77 Are property. The defendant argued the ancestral land was partitioned between them in 2007 and he was building only on his own allocated portion. Grounds for Rejection: The court found the plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case, failed to show balance of convenience in his favor, and would not suffer irreparable loss. Key issues included: the plaintiff suppressed facts about property area increasing from 3.375 to 3.77 Are without explanation; the defendant's construction was completed to lintel level with substantial investment; and credible witness affidavits supported the defendant's partition claim. Both parties bear their own costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts