State of Maharashtra vs Shivgonda Babgonda Patil — 64/2026
Case under The Cigarettes and Other Tobacco Products (Packaging and Labelling) Rules Section 20. Disposed: Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING on 24th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHKO180001192026
Filing Number
89/2026
Filing Date
06-Mar-2026
Registration No
64/2026
Registration Date
06-Mar-2026
Court
Civil and Criminal Court , Kurundwad
Judge
7-Jt. Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Kurundwad.
Decision Date
24-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING
Last updated 15-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
428
Police Station
Kurundwad Police Station
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State of Maharashtra
Adv. A. P. P.
Respondent(s)
-
1.Shivgonda Babgonda Patil
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
24-Mar-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Shivgonda Babgonda Patil (64/2026) Shivgonda Babgonda Patil was convicted under Section 20(2) of the Cigarettes and Other Tobacco Products Act, 2003, for selling unauthorized tobacco-containing 'Mawa' without required nicotine and tar content warnings on December 6, 2025. The accused, initially denying guilt, subsequently pleaded guilty and requested minimum punishment. The court accepted his guilty plea and sentenced him to pay Rs. 1,000, with five days' simple imprisonment as default penalty. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
24-Mar-2026
Disposed
Jt. Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Kurundwad.
-
16-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
06-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 64/2026
Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Shivgonda Babgonda Patil (64/2026) Shivgonda Babgonda Patil was convicted under Section 20(2) of the Cigarettes and Other Tobacco Products Act, 2003, for selling unauthorized tobacco-containing 'Mawa' without required nicotine and tar content warnings on December 6, 2025. The accused, initially denying guilt, subsequently pleaded guilty and requested minimum punishment. The court accepted his guilty plea and sentenced him to pay Rs. 1,000, with five days' simple imprisonment as default penalty. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts