State of Maharashtra vs Aniket Shashikant Babar — 63/2026

Case under The Cigarettes and Other Tobacco Products (Packaging and Labelling) Rules Section 20. Disposed: Uncontested--ABATED on 29th April 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHKO180001182026

Filing Number

88/2026

Filing Date

06-Mar-2026

Registration No

63/2026

Registration Date

06-Mar-2026

Court

Civil and Criminal Court , Kurundwad

Judge

3-Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Kurundwad

Decision Date

29-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ABATED

Last updated 15-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

427

Police Station

Kurundwad Police Station

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

The Cigarettes and Other Tobacco Products (Packaging and Labelling) Rules Section 20

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra

    Adv. A. P. P.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Aniket Shashikant Babar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 29-Apr-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Summary: The court abated the criminal proceedings against accused Aniket Shashikant Babar following the filing of his death certificate, which established that he died on 13.03.2026. In accordance with Chapter VI Para 84 of the Criminal Manual, the Judicial Magistrate cancelled any bail bonds and disposed of the case, noting that seized evidence had been destroyed by police officials. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 29-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Kurundwad

  4. 06-Apr-2026

    Notice_Unready

    Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Kurundwad

  5. 16-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 06-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 63/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The court abated the criminal proceedings against accused Aniket Shashikant Babar following the filing of his death certificate, which established that he died on 13.03.2026. In accordance with Chapter VI Para 84 of the Criminal Manual, the Judicial Magistrate cancelled any bail bonds and disposed of the case, noting that seized evidence had been destroyed by police officials. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case