State of Maharashtra vs Nayum Zakir Terdale — 59/2026

Case under The Cigarettes and Other Tobacco Products (Packaging and Labelling) Rules Section 20. Disposed: Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING on 25th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHKO180001102026

Filing Number

81/2026

Filing Date

05-Mar-2026

Registration No

59/2026

Registration Date

06-Mar-2026

Court

Civil and Criminal Court , Kurundwad

Judge

3-Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Kurundwad

Decision Date

25-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING

Last updated 15-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

344

Police Station

Kurundwad Police Station

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

The Cigarettes and Other Tobacco Products (Packaging and Labelling) Rules Section 20

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra

    Adv. A. P. P.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Nayum Zakir Terdale

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 25-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    The court found 21-year-old Nayum Zakir Terdale guilty under Section 20(2) of the Cigarettes and Other Tobacco Products Act for illegally manufacturing and selling unbranded gutka (tobacco mixture) without proper labeling or safety warnings at his pan shop. The court sentenced him to a fine of ₹1,000 with 7 days' simple imprisonment in default, considering his poor financial condition and status as the sole breadwinner of his family. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 25-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Kurundwad

  4. 16-Mar-2026

    Notice_Unready

    Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Kurundwad

  5. 13-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 05-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 59/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court found 21-year-old Nayum Zakir Terdale guilty under Section 20(2) of the Cigarettes and Other Tobacco Products Act for illegally manufacturing and selling unbranded gutka (tobacco mixture) without proper labeling or safety warnings at his pan shop. The court sentenced him to a fine of ₹1,000 with 7 days' simple imprisonment in default, considering his poor financial condition and status as the sole breadwinner of his family. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case