State of Maharashtra vs Vaman Raghunath Pujari (Khatedar) — 55/2026
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 84. Disposed: Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING on 25th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHKO180001062026
Filing Number
77/2026
Filing Date
05-Mar-2026
Registration No
55/2026
Registration Date
06-Mar-2026
Court
Civil and Criminal Court , Kurundwad
Judge
3-Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Kurundwad
Decision Date
25-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING
Last updated 15-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
441
Police Station
Kurundwad Police Station
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State of Maharashtra
Adv. A. P. P.
Respondent(s)
-
1.Vaman Raghunath Pujari (Khatedar)
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
25-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Case Summary: Case 55/2026 The First Class Magistrate Court in Kurunwad convicted respondent Vaman Raghunath Pujari (Khatedar), age 66, under Section 84 of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act for being found standing on a public road drinking alcohol near a liquor shop on December 19, 2025. The accused pleaded guilty to all charges and requested lenient punishment citing poor financial circumstances and being the sole family earner. The court sentenced him to a fine of ₹1,000 (or 10 days simple imprisonment if fine remains unpaid). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
25-Mar-2026
Disposed
Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Kurundwad
-
16-Mar-2026
Notice_Unready
Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Kurundwad
-
13-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
05-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 55/2026
Case Summary: Case 55/2026 The First Class Magistrate Court in Kurunwad convicted respondent Vaman Raghunath Pujari (Khatedar), age 66, under Section 84 of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act for being found standing on a public road drinking alcohol near a liquor shop on December 19, 2025. The accused pleaded guilty to all charges and requested lenient punishment citing poor financial circumstances and being the sole family earner. The court sentenced him to a fine of ₹1,000 (or 10 days simple imprisonment if fine remains unpaid). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts