Vilas alias Sunil Krishna Gurav vs Rajendra Marutrao Khade Advocate - M. S. Jadhav — 44/2023
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 29th June 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHKO180001042023
Next Hearing
29th June 2026
Filing Number
62/2023
Filing Date
03-02-2023
Registration No
44/2023
Registration Date
04-02-2023
Court
Civil and Criminal Court , Kurundwad
Judge
3-Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Kurundwad
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Vilas alias Sunil Krishna Gurav
Adv. D. D. Magdum
Respondent(s)
Rajendra Marutrao Khade Advocate - M. S. Jadhav
Hearing History
Judge: 3-Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Kurundwad
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 20-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 16-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 16-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 20-01-2026 | Evidence |
| 20-12-2025 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Summary of Case 44/2023 - Vilas alias Sunil Krishna Gurav v. Rajendra Marutrao Khade The court rejected the complainant's application for interim compensation under Section 143-A of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. The complainant sought 20% of a dishonored cheque amount (Rs. 2,95,000) as interim compensation. The court found that while Section 143-A is discretionary, the complainant failed to provide prima facie documentary evidence supporting claims of raising funds from a gold loan and business surplus, making it unsuitable to exercise discretion at the preliminary stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary of Case 44/2023 - Vilas alias Sunil Krishna Gurav v. Rajendra Marutrao Khade The court rejected the complainant's application for interim compensation under Section 143-A of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. The complainant sought 20% of a dishonored cheque amount (Rs. 2,95,000) as interim compensation. The court found that while Section 143-A is discretionary, the complainant failed to provide prima facie documentary evidence supporting claims of raising funds from a gold loan and business surplus, making it unsuitable to exercise discretion at the preliminary stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts