Vilas alias Sunil Krishna Gurav vs Rajendra Marutrao Khade Advocate - M. S. Jadhav — 44/2023
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 29th June 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHKO180001042023
Filing Number
62/2023
Filing Date
03-Feb-2023
Registration No
44/2023
Registration Date
04-Feb-2023
Court
Civil and Criminal Court , Kurundwad
Judge
3-Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Kurundwad
Last updated 15-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Vilas alias Sunil Krishna Gurav
Adv. D. D. Magdum
Respondent(s)
-
1.Rajendra Marutrao Khade Advocate - M. S. Jadhav
Case History
-
29-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
20-Apr-2026
Evidence
Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Kurundwad
-
16-Mar-2026
Evidence
Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Kurundwad
-
16-Feb-2026
Evidence
Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Kurundwad
-
20-Jan-2026
Evidence
Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Kurundwad
-
20-Dec-2025
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Summary of Case 44/2023 - Vilas alias Sunil Krishna Gurav v. Rajendra Marutrao Khade The court rejected the complainant's application for interim compensation under Section 143-A of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. The complainant sought 20% of a dishonored cheque amount (Rs. 2,95,000) as interim compensation. The court found that while Section 143-A is discretionary, the complainant failed to provide prima facie documentary evidence supporting claims of raising funds from a gold loan and business surplus, making it unsuitable to exercise discretion at the preliminary stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
20-Dec-2025
Evidence
Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Kurundwad
-
11-Dec-2025
Evidence
Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Kurundwad
-
26-Nov-2025
Evidence
Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Kurundwad
-
13-Nov-2025
Evidence
Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Kurundwad
-
04-Nov-2025
Evidence
Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Kurundwad
-
17-Oct-2025
Evidence
Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Kurundwad
-
02-Sep-2025
Evidence
Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Kurundwad
-
12-Aug-2025
Evidence
Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Kurundwad
-
04-Aug-2025
Evidence
Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Kurundwad
-
21-Jul-2025
Evidence
Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Kurundwad
-
05-Jul-2025
Evidence
Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Kurundwad
-
20-Jun-2025
Evidence
Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Kurundwad
-
06-May-2025
Evidence
Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Kurundwad
-
21-Apr-2025
Evidence
Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Kurundwad
-
10-Mar-2025
Evidence
Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Kurundwad
-
18-Feb-2025
Evidence
Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Kurundwad
-
24-Jan-2025
Evidence
Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Kurundwad
-
23-Dec-2024
Evidence
Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Kurundwad
-
26-Nov-2024
Evidence
Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Kurundwad
-
05-Nov-2024
Evidence
Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Kurundwad
-
23-Oct-2024
Plea / Particulars
Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Kurundwad
-
27-Sep-2024
Plea / Particulars
Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Kurundwad
-
23-Aug-2024
Filing of Surety
Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Kurundwad
-
08-Aug-2024
Filing of Surety
Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Kurundwad
-
09-Jul-2024
Filing of Surety
Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Kurundwad
-
09-Jul-2024
Filing of Surety
Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Kurundwad
-
28-Jun-2024
Filing of Surety
Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Kurundwad
-
14-Jun-2024
B.W._Unready
Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Kurundwad
-
06-Mar-2024
Steps
Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Kurundwad
-
12-Dec-2023
Steps
Jt. Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Kurundwad.
-
30-Oct-2023
Awaiting Summons
Jt. Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Kurundwad.
-
20-Sep-2023
Awaiting Summons
Jt. Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Kurundwad.
-
01-Aug-2023
Steps
Jt. Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Kurundwad.
-
01-Jul-2023
Awaiting Summons
Jt. Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Kurundwad.
-
15-May-2023
Awaiting Summons
Jt. Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Kurundwad.
-
10-Mar-2023
Awaiting Summons
Jt. Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Kurundwad.
-
07-Feb-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
03-Feb-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 44/2023
Summary of Case 44/2023 - Vilas alias Sunil Krishna Gurav v. Rajendra Marutrao Khade The court rejected the complainant's application for interim compensation under Section 143-A of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. The complainant sought 20% of a dishonored cheque amount (Rs. 2,95,000) as interim compensation. The court found that while Section 143-A is discretionary, the complainant failed to provide prima facie documentary evidence supporting claims of raising funds from a gold loan and business surplus, making it unsuitable to exercise discretion at the preliminary stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts