State of Maharashtra vs Mehbub Karim Khalifa — 52/2026
Case under The Cigarettes and Other Tobacco Products (Packaging and Labelling) Rules Section 20(2). Disposed: Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING on 24th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHKO180001032026
Filing Number
74/2026
Filing Date
05-Mar-2026
Registration No
52/2026
Registration Date
06-Mar-2026
Court
Civil and Criminal Court , Kurundwad
Judge
7-Jt. Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Kurundwad.
Decision Date
24-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING
Last updated 15-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
406
Police Station
Kurundwad Police Station
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State of Maharashtra
Adv. A. P. P.
Respondent(s)
-
1.Mehbub Karim Khalifa
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
24-Mar-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Mehbub Karim Khalifa (52/2026) Mehbub Karim Khalifa, a pan shop owner, was charged with selling tobacco-containing 'Mawa' without required health warnings under Section 20(2) of the Cigarettes and Other Tobacco Products Act, 2003. Initially pleading not guilty, the accused later voluntarily pleaded guilty and requested minimum punishment. The court accepted his guilty plea, considering his voluntariness and the offense's nature, and convicted him with leniency shown regarding imprisonment. Sentence: Fine of Rs.1,000 (or 5 days simple imprisonment in default). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
24-Mar-2026
Disposed
Jt. Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Kurundwad.
-
16-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
05-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 52/2026
Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Mehbub Karim Khalifa (52/2026) Mehbub Karim Khalifa, a pan shop owner, was charged with selling tobacco-containing 'Mawa' without required health warnings under Section 20(2) of the Cigarettes and Other Tobacco Products Act, 2003. Initially pleading not guilty, the accused later voluntarily pleaded guilty and requested minimum punishment. The court accepted his guilty plea, considering his voluntariness and the offense's nature, and convicted him with leniency shown regarding imprisonment. Sentence: Fine of Rs.1,000 (or 5 days simple imprisonment in default). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts