Vilas alias Sunil Krishna Gurav vs Rajendra Marutrao Khade Advocate - M. S. Jadhav — 43/2023

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 29th June 2026.

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHKO180001032023

Evidence

Next Hearing

29th June 2026

Filing Number

61/2023

Filing Date

03-02-2023

Registration No

43/2023

Registration Date

04-02-2023

Court

Civil and Criminal Court , Kurundwad

Judge

3-Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Kurundwad

Acts & Sections

NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS ACT Section 138

Petitioner(s)

Vilas alias Sunil Krishna Gurav

Adv. D. D. Magdum

Respondent(s)

Rajendra Marutrao Khade Advocate - M. S. Jadhav

Hearing History

Judge: 3-Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Kurundwad

20-04-2026

Evidence

16-03-2026

Evidence

16-02-2026

Evidence

20-01-2026

Evidence

20-12-2025

Evidence

Interim Orders

20-12-2025
Order on Exhibit

Case Summary: 43/2023 Outcome: The court rejected the complainant's application for interim compensation under Section 143-A of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. Key Details: Vilas Gurav sought 20% interim compensation (₹60,000) from accused Rajendra Khade on a dishonored cheque of ₹3,00,000. The court found that while Section 143-A grants discretionary power (not mandatory), the complainant failed to file prima facie documentary evidence supporting his claim that he had raised ₹8,95,000 through gold loans and business surplus to lend to the accused. Without such corroborating evidence at the preliminary stage, the court determined it was not appropriate to exercise discretion in granting interim compensation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 43/2023 Outcome: The court rejected the complainant's application for interim compensation under Section 143-A of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. Key Details: Vilas Gurav sought 20% interim compensation (₹60,000) from accused Rajendra Khade on a dishonored cheque of ₹3,00,000. The court found that while Section 143-A grants discretionary power (not mandatory), the complainant failed to file prima facie documentary evidence supporting his claim that he had raised ₹8,95,000 through gold loans and business surplus to lend to the accused. Without such corroborating evidence at the preliminary stage, the court determined it was not appropriate to exercise discretion in granting interim compensation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil and Criminal Court , Kurundwad All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case