Najuk Ganpati Gosavi vs State of Maharashtra — 6/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 497,503. Disposed: Contested--DECREED on 11th April 2026.
Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application
CNR: MHKO180000562026
e-Filing Number
01-02-2026
Filing Number
39/2026
Filing Date
04-02-2026
Registration No
6/2026
Registration Date
04-02-2026
Court
Civil and Criminal Court , Kurundwad
Judge
7-Jt. Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Kurundwad.
Decision Date
11th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DECREED
FIR Details
FIR Number
24
Police Station
Kurundwad Police Station
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Najuk Ganpati Gosavi
Adv. V. L. Jamadagni
Respondent(s)
State of Maharashtra
Hearing History
Judge: 7-Jt. Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Kurundwad.
Disposed
Arguments
Arguments
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Steps
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 11-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 09-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 06-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 01-04-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready |
| 16-03-2026 | Steps |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court allowed Najuk Ganpati Gosavi's application under BNSS sections 497 and 503 to recover kitchen utensils seized during crime investigation at Kurundwad Police Station. The court found the applicant had prima-facie established ownership, the investigating officer and prosecution had no objection, and no prejudice would result from releasing the property pending trial. The applicant was ordered to execute a ₹40,000 indemnity bond and comply with conditions including non-transfer of property and production on court demand. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court allowed Najuk Ganpati Gosavi's application under BNSS sections 497 and 503 to recover kitchen utensils seized during crime investigation at Kurundwad Police Station. The court found the applicant had prima-facie established ownership, the investigating officer and prosecution had no objection, and no prejudice would result from releasing the property pending trial. The applicant was ordered to execute a ₹40,000 indemnity bond and comply with conditions including non-transfer of property and production on court demand. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts