Sikandar Bandu Mujawar vs Mujjamil Mehbub Shaikh Advocate - R. J. Gorwade — 8/2026
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 38,39. Status: Argument on Exh.____Unready. Next hearing: 18th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHKO180000252026
e-Filing Number
20-01-2026
Filing Number
11/2026
Filing Date
20-Jan-2026
Registration No
8/2026
Registration Date
20-Jan-2026
Court
Civil and Criminal Court , Kurundwad
Judge
7-Jt. Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Kurundwad.
Last updated 15-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Sikandar Bandu Mujawar
Adv. M. S. Gerade
-
2.Sadat Bapu Shirole
Adv. D. A. Mane
-
3.Balaso Sahadev koli
Adv. MANE DHANASHRI ANANDA
-
4.Abdulkadar Khudbuddin Jamadar
Adv. MANE DHANASHRI ANANDA
-
5.Bashir Khudbuddin Jamadar
Adv. MANE DHANASHRI ANANDA
-
6.Mujibur Rahman kutubuddin Makanadar
Adv. MANE DHANASHRI ANANDA
-
7.Shamshad Chandso Tahsildar
Adv. MANE DHANASHRI ANANDA
-
8.Mukaram Amin Hirikude
Adv. MANE DHANASHRI ANANDA
-
9.Munaf Amin Hirikude
Adv. MANE DHANASHRI ANANDA
-
10.Rajaram Alias Rajendra Narayan Koli
Adv. MANE DHANASHRI ANANDA
Respondent(s)
-
1.Mujjamil Mehbub Shaikh Advocate - R. J. Gorwade
Case History
-
18-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
10-Jun-2026
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Jt. Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Kurundwad.
-
02-May-2026
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Jt. Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Kurundwad.
-
30-Apr-2026
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Jt. Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Kurundwad.
-
20-Apr-2026
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Jt. Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Kurundwad.
-
06-Apr-2026
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Jt. Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Kurundwad.
-
20-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
In Civil Suit No. 8/2026, the court allowed the plaintiff's application to amend the plaint and temporary injunction application under Order 6 Rule 17 of the CPC. The amendment incorporates findings from the Court Commissioner's report documenting defendant's encroachment on the suit property. The court found the amendment pertains to a subsequent event occurring during suit pendency, does not change the suit's nature, and allows the defendant consequential amendments to prevent prejudice. The plaintiff was directed to carry out the amendment within the statutory period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
20-Mar-2026
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Jt. Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Kurundwad.
-
16-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
-
16-Mar-2026
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Jt. Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Kurundwad.
-
27-Feb-2026
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Jt. Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Kurundwad.
-
24-Feb-2026
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Jt. Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Kurundwad.
-
20-Feb-2026
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Jt. Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Kurundwad.
-
09-Feb-2026
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Jt. Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Kurundwad.
-
31-Jan-2026
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Jt. Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Kurundwad.
-
29-Jan-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
-
29-Jan-2026
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Jt. Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Kurundwad.
-
28-Jan-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
-
28-Jan-2026
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Jt. Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Kurundwad.
-
27-Jan-2026
Written Statement
Jt. Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Kurundwad.
-
20-Jan-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
20-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 8/2026
In Civil Suit No. 8/2026, the court allowed the plaintiff's application to amend the plaint and temporary injunction application under Order 6 Rule 17 of the CPC. The amendment incorporates findings from the Court Commissioner's report documenting defendant's encroachment on the suit property. The court found the amendment pertains to a subsequent event occurring during suit pendency, does not change the suit's nature, and allows the defendant consequential amendments to prevent prejudice. The plaintiff was directed to carry out the amendment within the statutory period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts