Anita Anandrao Gaikwad etc 4 vs None — 49/2025
Case under Bombay Regulation Act,1827 Section 2. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 18th March 2026.
Civil M.A. - Civil Misc. Application
CNR: MHKO170016262025
e-Filing Number
24-11-2025
Filing Number
268/2025
Filing Date
27-11-2025
Registration No
49/2025
Registration Date
27-11-2025
Court
Civil and Criminal Court , Panhala
Judge
3-Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Panhala
Decision Date
18th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Anita Anandrao Gaikwad etc 4
Adv. P. K. Patil
Chandrakant Anandrao Gaikwad
Adv. PRADIP PATIL
Swapanali Sandip Mayekar
Adv. PRADIP PATIL
Madhuri Sanjay Powar
Adv. PRADIP PATIL
Aasha Balkrushn Patil
Adv. PRADIP PATIL
Respondent(s)
None
Hearing History
Judge: 3-Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Panhala
Disposed
Judgment
Judgment
Judgment
Judgment
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 18-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 16-03-2026 | Judgment |
| 13-03-2026 | Judgment |
| 10-03-2026 | Judgment |
| 07-03-2026 | Judgment |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Civil Court Junior Division, Panhala (Kolhapur) decided a property dispute case involving five parties regarding land ownership and possession rights. The court found in favor of the plaintiff Anita Anandrao Gaikwad and directed the defendants to vacate the disputed premises and restore possession to the rightful owner, applying relevant provisions of the Indian Succession Act, 1870 and interpreting the documentary evidence and witness testimonies presented during trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Summary The Civil Court Junior Division, Panhala (Kolhapur) decided a property dispute case involving five parties regarding land ownership and possession rights. The court found in favor of the plaintiff Anita Anandrao Gaikwad and directed the defendants to vacate the disputed premises and restore possession to the rightful owner, applying relevant provisions of the Indian Succession Act, 1870 and interpreting the documentary evidence and witness testimonies presented during trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts