State of Maharashtra vs Shravan Dilip Jadhav Advocate - S. P. Lokhande — 1016/2024

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 66(B). Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 02nd April 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHKO170015172024

e-Filing Number

27-12-2024

Filing Number

1252/2024

Filing Date

30-Dec-2024

Registration No

1016/2024

Registration Date

30-Dec-2024

Court

Civil and Criminal Court , Panhala

Judge

3-Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Panhala

Decision Date

02-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

Last updated 15-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

217

Police Station

Kodoli Police Station

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 66(B)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra

    Adv. A.P.P.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Shravan Dilip Jadhav Advocate - S. P. Lokhande

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 02-Apr-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Summary of Case No. 1016/2024: The court acquitted Shravan Dilip Jadhav of charges under Section 66(b) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act for allegedly consuming liquor in a public place. The prosecution failed to establish the seizure of the alleged contraband from the accused's possession due to material discrepancies in witness testimony, lack of independent corroboration from the panch witness, and absence of chemical analysis proving the seized substance was actually liquor. The court found the prosecution's evidence insufficient to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 02-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Panhala

  4. 30-Mar-2026

    Judgment

    Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Panhala

  5. 27-Mar-2026

    Judgment

    Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Panhala

  6. 25-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Panhala

  7. 23-Mar-2026

    EvidenceView PDF

  8. 23-Mar-2026

    Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.

    Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Panhala

  9. 16-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Panhala

  10. 26-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Panhala

  11. 11-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Panhala

  12. 28-Jan-2026

    Hearing

    Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Panhala

  13. 19-Jan-2026

    Hearing

    Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Panhala

  14. 26-Nov-2025

    Hearing

    Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Panhala

  15. 12-Nov-2025

    Hearing

    Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Panhala

  16. 24-Sep-2025

    Hearing

    Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Panhala

  17. 03-Sep-2025

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  18. 03-Sep-2025

    Hearing

    Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Panhala

  19. 21-Jul-2025

    Hearing

    Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Panhala

  20. 18-Jun-2025

    Plea / Particulars

    Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Panhala

  21. 26-Mar-2025

    Awaiting Summons

    Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Panhala

  22. 30-Dec-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  23. 30-Dec-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1016/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case No. 1016/2024: The court acquitted Shravan Dilip Jadhav of charges under Section 66(b) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act for allegedly consuming liquor in a public place. The prosecution failed to establish the seizure of the alleged contraband from the accused's possession due to material discrepancies in witness testimony, lack of independent corroboration from the panch witness, and absence of chemical analysis proving the seized substance was actually liquor. The court found the prosecution's evidence insufficient to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case