State of Maharashtra vs Suresh Hindurav Samudre Advocate - S. N. Patil — 979/2024
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 279. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 19th May 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHKO170014672024
Next Hearing
19th May 2026
e-Filing Number
20-12-2024
Filing Number
1205/2024
Filing Date
20-12-2024
Registration No
979/2024
Registration Date
20-12-2024
Court
Civil and Criminal Court , Panhala
Judge
3-Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Panhala
FIR Details
FIR Number
3
Police Station
Kodoli Police Station
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra
Adv. A.P.P.
Respondent(s)
Suresh Hindurav Samudre Advocate - S. N. Patil
Hearing History
Judge: 3-Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Panhala
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Hearing
Hearing
Hearing
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 21-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 07-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 10-03-2026 | Hearing |
| 04-03-2026 | Hearing |
| 09-02-2026 | Hearing |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: In FIR No. 979/2024, State v. Suresh Hindurav Samudre, a drunk-driving case where the accused tested positive (550.0/100 on breathalyzer) on December 31, 2023, the court examined the credibility of the breath analyzer evidence and police procedures. The court found significant defects in the evidence collection process, including lack of proper documentation, videography, and separate photographs, and rejected the prosecution's breathalyzer report as unreliable. The case was dismissed on April 7, 2026, with the court accepting the defense's cross-examination that undermined the prosecution's evidence integrity. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: In FIR No. 979/2024, State v. Suresh Hindurav Samudre, a drunk-driving case where the accused tested positive (550.0/100 on breathalyzer) on December 31, 2023, the court examined the credibility of the breath analyzer evidence and police procedures. The court found significant defects in the evidence collection process, including lack of proper documentation, videography, and separate photographs, and rejected the prosecution's breathalyzer report as unreliable. The case was dismissed on April 7, 2026, with the court accepting the defense's cross-examination that undermined the prosecution's evidence integrity. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts