State of Maharashtra vs Suresh Hindurav Samudre Advocate - S. N. Patil — 979/2024

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 279. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 19th May 2026.

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHKO170014672024

Evidence Part Heard

Next Hearing

19th May 2026

e-Filing Number

20-12-2024

Filing Number

1205/2024

Filing Date

20-12-2024

Registration No

979/2024

Registration Date

20-12-2024

Court

Civil and Criminal Court , Panhala

Judge

3-Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Panhala

FIR Details

FIR Number

3

Police Station

Kodoli Police Station

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

INDIAN PENAL CODE Section 279
MOTOR VEHICLES ACT Section 185

Petitioner(s)

State of Maharashtra

Adv. A.P.P.

Respondent(s)

Suresh Hindurav Samudre Advocate - S. N. Patil

Hearing History

Judge: 3-Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Panhala

21-04-2026

Evidence Part Heard

07-04-2026

Evidence Part Heard

10-03-2026

Hearing

04-03-2026

Hearing

09-02-2026

Hearing

Interim Orders

07-04-2026
Evidence

Case Summary: In FIR No. 979/2024, State v. Suresh Hindurav Samudre, a drunk-driving case where the accused tested positive (550.0/100 on breathalyzer) on December 31, 2023, the court examined the credibility of the breath analyzer evidence and police procedures. The court found significant defects in the evidence collection process, including lack of proper documentation, videography, and separate photographs, and rejected the prosecution's breathalyzer report as unreliable. The case was dismissed on April 7, 2026, with the court accepting the defense's cross-examination that undermined the prosecution's evidence integrity. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: In FIR No. 979/2024, State v. Suresh Hindurav Samudre, a drunk-driving case where the accused tested positive (550.0/100 on breathalyzer) on December 31, 2023, the court examined the credibility of the breath analyzer evidence and police procedures. The court found significant defects in the evidence collection process, including lack of proper documentation, videography, and separate photographs, and rejected the prosecution's breathalyzer report as unreliable. The case was dismissed on April 7, 2026, with the court accepting the defense's cross-examination that undermined the prosecution's evidence integrity. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil and Criminal Court , Panhala All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case