State Of Maharashtra vs Bapu Ganpati Dalavi etc 3 Advocate - R. R. Torse — 100/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 118(1),115(2),352,3(5). Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 04th May 2026.
R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case
CNR: MHKO170013762025
e-Filing Number
17-09-2025
Filing Number
1169/2025
Filing Date
08-09-2025
Registration No
100/2025
Registration Date
01-10-2025
Court
Civil and Criminal Court , Panhala
Judge
2-C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Panhala
Decision Date
04th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
139
Police Station
Panhala Police Station
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State Of Maharashtra
Adv. Sumitra Suryabhan Garje
Respondent(s)
Bapu Ganpati Dalavi etc 3 Advocate - R. R. Torse
Onkar Bapu Dalavi
Adv. null
Pruthviraj Jaywant Savekar
Adv. null
Akash Dinkar Dalavi
Adv. null
Hearing History
Judge: 2-C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Panhala
Disposed
Arguments
Arguments
Hearing
Hearing
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 04-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 16-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 09-03-2026 | Hearing |
| 23-02-2026 | Hearing |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Bapu Ganpati Dalavi (Case 100/2025) Court Decision: The First Class Judicial Magistrate at Panhala convicted all four accused (Bapu Ganpati Dalavi, Onkar Bapu Dalavi, Pruthviraj Jaywant Savekar, and Akash Dinkar Dalavi) under IPC 2023 Sections 118(1), 115(2), 352 with Section 3(5), sentencing each to Rs. 7,500 fine. The court found sufficient evidence through prosecution witnesses establishing the charges related to criminal intimidation and assault. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Bapu Ganpati Dalavi (Case 100/2025) Court Decision: The First Class Judicial Magistrate at Panhala convicted all four accused (Bapu Ganpati Dalavi, Onkar Bapu Dalavi, Pruthviraj Jaywant Savekar, and Akash Dinkar Dalavi) under IPC 2023 Sections 118(1), 115(2), 352 with Section 3(5), sentencing each to Rs. 7,500 fine. The court found sufficient evidence through prosecution witnesses establishing the charges related to criminal intimidation and assault. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts