Shri. Warna Sahakari Bank Ltd Warana Nagar Tarfe Clerk Shri. Sandip Jaysing Jadhav vs Shri Ganesh Agro Farm — 987/2025
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Status: Lok-Nyayalaya. Next hearing: 02nd September 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHKO170013442025
e-Filing Number
22-09-2025
Filing Number
1143/2025
Filing Date
23-Sep-2025
Registration No
987/2025
Registration Date
23-Sep-2025
Court
Civil and Criminal Court , Panhala
Judge
2-C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Panhala
Last updated 15-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Shri. Warna Sahakari Bank Ltd Warana Nagar Tarfe Clerk Shri. Sandip Jaysing Jadhav
Adv. A. A. BachePatil
Respondent(s)
-
1.Shri Ganesh Agro Farm
-
2.Swati Babasaheb Walake
Case History
-
02-Sep-2026
Next hearingPending
-
10-Jun-2026
Lok-Nyayalaya
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Panhala
-
16-Mar-2026
Awaiting Summons
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Panhala
-
30-Jan-2026
Awaiting Summons
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Panhala
-
21-Nov-2025
Awaiting Summons
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Panhala
-
29-Sep-2025
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Case 987/2025 Summary: The JMFC Panhala issued process against accused Shri Ganesh Agro Farm under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The court found prima facie evidence that a cheque given by the accused toward a legally enforceable debt was dishonored; despite receiving a mandatory 15-day notice, the accused failed to make payment, establishing sufficient cause of action for the offense. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
29-Sep-2025
Awaiting Summons
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Panhala
-
23-Sep-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
23-Sep-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 987/2025
Case 987/2025 Summary: The JMFC Panhala issued process against accused Shri Ganesh Agro Farm under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The court found prima facie evidence that a cheque given by the accused toward a legally enforceable debt was dishonored; despite receiving a mandatory 15-day notice, the accused failed to make payment, establishing sufficient cause of action for the offense. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts