Vardayini Gruhtaran Sahakari Sanstha Marya Kodoli Tarfe Nandkumar Sambhaji Jadhav vs Shri Vinod Jaysing Patil — 969/2025
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Status: Awaiting Summons. Next hearing: 13th July 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHKO170013112025
e-Filing Number
16-09-2025
Filing Number
1119/2025
Filing Date
15-Sep-2025
Registration No
969/2025
Registration Date
16-Sep-2025
Court
Civil and Criminal Court , Panhala
Judge
3-Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Panhala
Last updated 15-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Vardayini Gruhtaran Sahakari Sanstha Marya Kodoli Tarfe Nandkumar Sambhaji Jadhav
Adv. Nandkumar Chandrakant Khamkar
Respondent(s)
-
1.Shri Vinod Jaysing Patil
Case History
-
13-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
19-May-2026
Awaiting Summons
Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Panhala
-
16-Mar-2026
Awaiting Summons
Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Panhala
-
27-Jan-2026
Awaiting Summons
Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Panhala
-
02-Dec-2025
Awaiting Summons
Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Panhala
-
16-Sep-2025
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Case Summary: S.C.C./969/2025 The court issued process against accused Shri Vinod Jaysing Patil under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for dishonoring a cheque. The complainant established prima facie that a cheque for a legally enforceable debt was dishonored due to insufficient funds, and despite receiving a mandatory 15-day notice, the accused failed to make payment. The court found all essential elements of the offense satisfied and ordered summons to be issued. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-Sep-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
15-Sep-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 969/2025
Case Summary: S.C.C./969/2025 The court issued process against accused Shri Vinod Jaysing Patil under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for dishonoring a cheque. The complainant established prima facie that a cheque for a legally enforceable debt was dishonored due to insufficient funds, and despite receiving a mandatory 15-day notice, the accused failed to make payment. The court found all essential elements of the offense satisfied and ordered summons to be issued. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts