Sou. Shalan Dinkar Patil vs Kiran Hari Patil Advocate - पी. ए. महाजन — 183/2022

Case 183/2022 Summary: The defendant's application to set aside the "No Written Statement" order was allowed. The court found the defendant's delay in filing the written statement was justified due to unavailability of old documents from the land acquisition department and accepted the affidavit-based explanation. The defendant's written statement was taken on record, the "No Written Statement" order was set aside, and the defendant was ordered to pay ₹500 as costs to the plaintiff. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.