Shri Hanuman Gramin Biger Sheti Sahakari Path Sanstha Kotoli Tarfe Vasuli Adhikari Shri. Suraj Maka vs Shri. Sumitkumar Vishwas Dongare Advocate - S. P. Lokhande — 794/2024

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Status: Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.. Next hearing: 15th June 2026.

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHKO170012082024

Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.

Next Hearing

15th June 2026

e-Filing Number

21-10-2024

Filing Number

993/2024

Filing Date

22-10-2024

Registration No

794/2024

Registration Date

22-10-2024

Court

Civil and Criminal Court , Panhala

Judge

3-Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Panhala

Acts & Sections

NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS ACT Section 138

Petitioner(s)

Shri Hanuman Gramin Biger Sheti Sahakari Path Sanstha Kotoli Tarfe Vasuli Adhikari Shri. Suraj Maka

Adv. B. B. Shelar

Respondent(s)

Shri. Sumitkumar Vishwas Dongare Advocate - S. P. Lokhande

Hearing History

Judge: 3-Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Panhala

01-06-2026

Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.

19-05-2026

Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.

18-05-2026

Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.

04-05-2026

Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.

27-04-2026

Evidence Part Heard

Interim Orders

18-02-2026
Evidence
26-02-2026
Evidence

Summary of Case 794/2024 Cross-examination concluded. The court completed examination of a witness (Vasuli Adhikari/loan collection officer) from Hanuman Gramin Biger Sheti cooperative society on 26.02.2026. The witness testified regarding loan disbursement procedures, loan welfare fund deductions, computerized account statements, and cheque issuance to the accused. Cross-examination was completed without further re-examination. The witness testimony has been accepted by the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case 794/2024 Cross-examination concluded. The court completed examination of a witness (Vasuli Adhikari/loan collection officer) from Hanuman Gramin Biger Sheti cooperative society on 26.02.2026. The witness testified regarding loan disbursement procedures, loan welfare fund deductions, computerized account statements, and cheque issuance to the accused. Cross-examination was completed without further re-examination. The witness testimony has been accepted by the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil and Criminal Court , Panhala All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case