Sagubai Rangrao Chechar etc 1 vs Indubai Rangrao Patil etc 1 Advocate - S. M. Raibagkar2. — 52/2024

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 153. Status: Hearing. Next hearing: 09th June 2026.

Hearing Next hearing 09-Jun-2026 this date has passed

Civil M.A. - Civil Misc. Application

CNR: MHKO170011692024

e-Filing Number

30-09-2024

Filing Number

214/2024

Filing Date

01-Oct-2024

Registration No

52/2024

Registration Date

01-Oct-2024

Court

Civil and Criminal Court , Panhala

Judge

3-Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Panhala

Last updated 11-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 153

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Sagubai Rangrao Chechar etc 1

    Adv. Shriram Vishnu Mane

  2. 2.Smt. Kavshalya Subhash Nirmale

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Indubai Rangrao Patil etc 1 Advocate - S. M. Raibagkar2.

  2. 2.Sanjay Rangrao Patil 2.

  3. 3.Subhash Rangrao Patil

Case History

  1. 09-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 28-Apr-2026

    Hearing

    Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Panhala

  3. 07-Apr-2026

    Hearing

    Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Panhala

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Panhala

  5. 17-Feb-2026

    EvidenceView PDF

    Case Summary Case: Civil Appeal No. 52/2024 - Sugubaai Rangrao Chechar vs. Indubaai Rangrao Patil Outcome: The appeal is allowed in full. The court set aside the erroneous judgment in Civil Case No. 155/2014 and remitted the matter back to the trial court for corrective action. The witness testimony revealed material errors in the original judgment regarding property distribution rights, and the court found that false statements were made during cross-examination regarding the equal inheritance rights of all three daughters under Hindu law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  6. 17-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Panhala

  7. 03-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Panhala

  8. 27-Jan-2026

    Hearing

    Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Panhala

  9. 23-Dec-2025

    Hearing

    Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Panhala

  10. 09-Dec-2025

    EvidenceView PDF

  11. 09-Dec-2025

    Hearing

    Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Panhala

  12. 18-Nov-2025

    Hearing

    Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Panhala

  13. 14-Oct-2025

    Hearing

    Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Panhala

  14. 30-Sep-2025

    Hearing

    Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Panhala

  15. 16-Sep-2025

    Hearing

    Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Panhala

  16. 02-Sep-2025

    Hearing

    Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Panhala

  17. 12-Aug-2025

    EvidenceView PDF

  18. 12-Aug-2025

    Hearing

    Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Panhala

  19. 29-Jul-2025

    Hearing

    Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Panhala

  20. 15-Jul-2025

    Hearing

    Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Panhala

  21. 01-Jul-2025

    Hearing

    Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Panhala

  22. 24-Jun-2025

    Hearing

    Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Panhala

  23. 06-May-2025

    Hearing

    Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Panhala

  24. 22-Apr-2025

    Hearing

    Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Panhala

  25. 01-Apr-2025

    Hearing

    Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Panhala

  26. 11-Mar-2025

    Hearing

    Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Panhala

  27. 18-Feb-2025

    Hearing

    Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Panhala

  28. 04-Feb-2025

    Hearing

    Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Panhala

  29. 08-Jan-2025

    Evidence

    C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Panhala

  30. 26-Nov-2024

    Written Statement

    C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Panhala

  31. 15-Oct-2024

    W.S. and Say

    Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Panhala

  32. 01-Oct-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  33. 01-Oct-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 52/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary Case: Civil Appeal No. 52/2024 - Sugubaai Rangrao Chechar vs. Indubaai Rangrao Patil Outcome: The appeal is allowed in full. The court set aside the erroneous judgment in Civil Case No. 155/2014 and remitted the matter back to the trial court for corrective action. The witness testimony revealed material errors in the original judgment regarding property distribution rights, and the court found that false statements were made during cross-examination regarding the equal inheritance rights of all three daughters under Hindu law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case