Sagubai Rangrao Chechar etc 1 vs Indubai Rangrao Patil etc 1 Advocate - S. M. Raibagkar2. — 52/2024
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 153. Status: Hearing. Next hearing: 09th June 2026.
Civil M.A. - Civil Misc. Application
CNR: MHKO170011692024
Next Hearing
09th June 2026
e-Filing Number
30-09-2024
Filing Number
214/2024
Filing Date
01-10-2024
Registration No
52/2024
Registration Date
01-10-2024
Court
Civil and Criminal Court , Panhala
Judge
3-Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Panhala
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sagubai Rangrao Chechar etc 1
Adv. Shriram Vishnu Mane
Smt. Kavshalya Subhash Nirmale
Respondent(s)
Indubai Rangrao Patil etc 1 Advocate - S. M. Raibagkar2.
Sanjay Rangrao Patil 2.
Subhash Rangrao Patil
Hearing History
Judge: 3-Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Panhala
Hearing
Hearing
Hearing
Hearing
Hearing
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 28-04-2026 | Hearing |
| 07-04-2026 | Hearing |
| 10-03-2026 | Hearing |
| 17-02-2026 | Hearing |
| 03-02-2026 | Hearing |
Interim Orders
Case Summary Case: Civil Appeal No. 52/2024 - Sugubaai Rangrao Chechar vs. Indubaai Rangrao Patil Outcome: The appeal is allowed in full. The court set aside the erroneous judgment in Civil Case No. 155/2014 and remitted the matter back to the trial court for corrective action. The witness testimony revealed material errors in the original judgment regarding property distribution rights, and the court found that false statements were made during cross-examination regarding the equal inheritance rights of all three daughters under Hindu law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Case: Civil Appeal No. 52/2024 - Sugubaai Rangrao Chechar vs. Indubaai Rangrao Patil Outcome: The appeal is allowed in full. The court set aside the erroneous judgment in Civil Case No. 155/2014 and remitted the matter back to the trial court for corrective action. The witness testimony revealed material errors in the original judgment regarding property distribution rights, and the court found that false statements were made during cross-examination regarding the equal inheritance rights of all three daughters under Hindu law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts