State of Maharashtra vs Rajan Baburao Chopade Advocate - Sachin S. Patil — 642/2024
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 66(B). Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 11th May 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHKO170009952024
Next Hearing
11th May 2026
Filing Number
813/2024
Filing Date
17-08-2024
Registration No
642/2024
Registration Date
17-08-2024
Court
Civil and Criminal Court , Panhala
Judge
3-Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Panhala
FIR Details
FIR Number
103
Police Station
Kodoli Police Station
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra
Adv. A.P.P.
Respondent(s)
Rajan Baburao Chopade Advocate - Sachin S. Patil
Hearing History
Judge: 3-Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Panhala
Arguments
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
Evidence Part Heard
Hearing
Hearing
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 02-05-2026 | Arguments |
| 22-04-2026 | Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C. |
| 07-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 10-03-2026 | Hearing |
| 04-03-2026 | Hearing |
Interim Orders
Summary: In this criminal case (FIR No. 642/2024) filed by the State against Rajan Baburao Chopde for illegal liquor possession, the court recorded the examination-in-chief of government witness Vineet Shivaji Patil (a Panch/jury member). The witness testified regarding the panchnama (seizure memo) prepared on 15.04.2024 near a meat market in Kodoli, where liquor was seized from the accused. The cross-examination by the accused's counsel was permitted, and the witness statement was recorded on 22.04.2026 before the First Class Judicial Magistrate at Panhala. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: In this criminal case (FIR No. 642/2024) filed by the State against Rajan Baburao Chopde for illegal liquor possession, the court recorded the examination-in-chief of government witness Vineet Shivaji Patil (a Panch/jury member). The witness testified regarding the panchnama (seizure memo) prepared on 15.04.2024 near a meat market in Kodoli, where liquor was seized from the accused. The cross-examination by the accused's counsel was permitted, and the witness statement was recorded on 22.04.2026 before the First Class Judicial Magistrate at Panhala. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts