Shri Mahalaxmi Gramin Sahakari Pathsanstha Marya Tarfe Shri Indrajeet Prakash Jadhav vs Ajuruddin Ibrahim Faras Advocate - Pradeep Mahadev Patil — 675/2025
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Status: Hearing. Next hearing: 15th June 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHKO170009072025
Next Hearing
15th June 2026
e-Filing Number
23-06-2025
Filing Number
771/2025
Filing Date
24-06-2025
Registration No
675/2025
Registration Date
24-06-2025
Court
Civil and Criminal Court , Panhala
Judge
3-Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Panhala
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Shri Mahalaxmi Gramin Sahakari Pathsanstha Marya Tarfe Shri Indrajeet Prakash Jadhav
Adv. L. B. Patil
Respondent(s)
Ajuruddin Ibrahim Faras Advocate - Pradeep Mahadev Patil
Hearing History
Judge: 3-Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Panhala
Hearing
Hearing
Hearing
Hearing
Hearing
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 04-05-2026 | Hearing |
| 16-03-2026 | Hearing |
| 09-02-2026 | Hearing |
| 22-12-2025 | Hearing |
| 17-11-2025 | Hearing |
Interim Orders
Case Summary - 675/2025 The Judicial Magistrate First Class, Panhala, issued process against accused Ajuruddin Ibrahim Faras for cheque dishonour under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The court found prima facie that the accused gave a cheque for legally enforceable debt which was dishonoured due to insufficient funds, and despite receiving a mandatory 15-day notice, failed to make payment. All essential ingredients of the offence were established, warranting issuance of process under Section 227(1)(a) of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita 2023. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary - 675/2025 The Judicial Magistrate First Class, Panhala, issued process against accused Ajuruddin Ibrahim Faras for cheque dishonour under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The court found prima facie that the accused gave a cheque for legally enforceable debt which was dishonoured due to insufficient funds, and despite receiving a mandatory 15-day notice, failed to make payment. All essential ingredients of the offence were established, warranting issuance of process under Section 227(1)(a) of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita 2023. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts