Shri Mahalaxmi Gramin Sahakari Pathsanstha Marya Tarfe Shri Indrajeet Prakash Jadhav vs Ajuruddin Ibrahim Faras Advocate - Pradeep Mahadev Patil — 675/2025

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Status: Hearing. Next hearing: 15th June 2026.

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHKO170009072025

Hearing

Next Hearing

15th June 2026

e-Filing Number

23-06-2025

Filing Number

771/2025

Filing Date

24-06-2025

Registration No

675/2025

Registration Date

24-06-2025

Court

Civil and Criminal Court , Panhala

Judge

3-Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Panhala

Acts & Sections

NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS ACT Section 138

Petitioner(s)

Shri Mahalaxmi Gramin Sahakari Pathsanstha Marya Tarfe Shri Indrajeet Prakash Jadhav

Adv. L. B. Patil

Respondent(s)

Ajuruddin Ibrahim Faras Advocate - Pradeep Mahadev Patil

Hearing History

Judge: 3-Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Panhala

04-05-2026

Hearing

16-03-2026

Hearing

09-02-2026

Hearing

22-12-2025

Hearing

17-11-2025

Hearing

Interim Orders

25-06-2025
Order on Exhibit

Case Summary - 675/2025 The Judicial Magistrate First Class, Panhala, issued process against accused Ajuruddin Ibrahim Faras for cheque dishonour under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The court found prima facie that the accused gave a cheque for legally enforceable debt which was dishonoured due to insufficient funds, and despite receiving a mandatory 15-day notice, failed to make payment. All essential ingredients of the offence were established, warranting issuance of process under Section 227(1)(a) of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita 2023. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary - 675/2025 The Judicial Magistrate First Class, Panhala, issued process against accused Ajuruddin Ibrahim Faras for cheque dishonour under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The court found prima facie that the accused gave a cheque for legally enforceable debt which was dishonoured due to insufficient funds, and despite receiving a mandatory 15-day notice, failed to make payment. All essential ingredients of the offence were established, warranting issuance of process under Section 227(1)(a) of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita 2023. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil and Criminal Court , Panhala All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case