State of Maharashtra vs Vasant Shivram Sawant Advocate - बी. एस. आंबेकर — 588/2024

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e). Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 23rd April 2026.

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHKO170008752024

Case disposed

Filing Number

730/2024

Filing Date

12-07-2024

Registration No

588/2024

Registration Date

12-07-2024

Court

Civil and Criminal Court , Panhala

Judge

3-Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Panhala

Decision Date

23rd April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

FIR Details

FIR Number

81

Police Station

Kodoli Police Station

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

MAHARASHTRA PROHIBITION ACT Section 65(e)

Petitioner(s)

State of Maharashtra

Adv. A.P.P.

Respondent(s)

Vasant Shivram Sawant Advocate - बी. एस. आंबेकर

Hearing History

Judge: 3-Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Panhala

23-04-2026

Disposed

20-04-2026

Judgment

13-04-2026

Arguments

07-04-2026

Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.

10-03-2026

Evidence Part Heard

Final Orders / Judgements

23-04-2026
Copy of Judgment

Summary The Judicial Magistrate First Class, Panhala acquitted 77-year-old Vasant Shivram Sawant of charges under Section 65(e) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act for allegedly possessing 14 bottles of country liquor. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove the seizure of contraband due to lack of independent witness corroboration, absence of chemical analysis confirming the substance was intoxicant, and insufficient evidence quality. The court emphasized that while a sole witness's testimony can be believed if trustworthy and discrepancy-free, the prosecution's failure to examine independent witnesses and provide lab reports created reasonable doubt, warranting acquittal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

24-02-2026
Evidence
07-04-2026
Evidence
casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Judicial Magistrate First Class, Panhala acquitted 77-year-old Vasant Shivram Sawant of charges under Section 65(e) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act for allegedly possessing 14 bottles of country liquor. The court found that the prosecution failed to prove the seizure of contraband due to lack of independent witness corroboration, absence of chemical analysis confirming the substance was intoxicant, and insufficient evidence quality. The court emphasized that while a sole witness's testimony can be believed if trustworthy and discrepancy-free, the prosecution's failure to examine independent witnesses and provide lab reports created reasonable doubt, warranting acquittal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil and Criminal Court , Panhala All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case