Shalan Dinkar Patil vs Rekha Kiran Patil oth 1 Advocate - P. A. Mahajan — 110/2022
Case under Code of Civil Procedure. Status: Issues. Next hearing: 13th July 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHKO170006622022
Filing Number
178/2022
Filing Date
06-Jul-2022
Registration No
110/2022
Registration Date
11-Jul-2022
Court
Civil and Criminal Court , Panhala
Judge
3-Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Panhala
Last updated 15-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Shalan Dinkar Patil
Adv. Avinash B Patil
Respondent(s)
-
1.Rekha Kiran Patil oth 1 Advocate - P. A. Mahajan
-
2.Seema Sanjay Patil
Case History
-
13-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
27-Apr-2026
Issues
Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Panhala
-
16-Mar-2026
Issues
Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Panhala
-
02-Feb-2026
Issues
Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Panhala
-
08-Dec-2025
Issues
Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Panhala
-
03-Nov-2025
Issues
Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Panhala
-
28-Aug-2025
Issues
Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Panhala
-
17-Jul-2025
Issues
Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Panhala
-
16-Jun-2025
Issues
Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Panhala
-
28-Apr-2025
Issues
Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Panhala
-
24-Mar-2025
Issues
Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Panhala
-
10-Feb-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Panhala
-
06-Jan-2025
Argument on Exh.____Unready
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Panhala
-
18-Nov-2024
Argument on Exh.____Unready
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Panhala
-
23-Sep-2024
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Panhala
-
19-Aug-2024
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Panhala
-
29-Jul-2024
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Panhala
-
24-Jun-2024
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Panhala
-
15-Apr-2024
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Panhala
-
04-Mar-2024
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Panhala
-
08-Jan-2024
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Panhala
-
20-Nov-2023
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Panhala
-
09-Oct-2023
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Panhala
-
04-Sep-2023
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Panhala
-
20-Jul-2023
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Panhala
-
12-Jun-2023
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Panhala
-
10-Apr-2023
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Panhala
-
09-Mar-2023
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Panhala
-
20-Feb-2023
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Case Summary: Civil Suit No. 110/2022 Defendant No. 1's application to set aside the "No Written Statement" order was allowed. The court found that while the defendant failed to file his written statement within the stipulated period, his reasons for delay—unavailability of old revenue documents—were credible as claimed under affidavit. The court set aside the No Written Statement order and permitted defendant No. 1's written statement to be taken on record, applying principles of natural justice and fair opportunity. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
20-Feb-2023
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Panhala
-
30-Jan-2023
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Panhala
-
19-Dec-2022
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Panhala
-
24-Nov-2022
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Panhala
-
21-Nov-2022
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Panhala
-
07-Nov-2022
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Panhala
-
19-Sep-2022
W.S. and Say
Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Panhala
-
29-Aug-2022
W.S. and Say
Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Panhala
-
25-Jul-2022
W.S. and Say
Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Panhala
-
11-Jul-2022
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
06-Jul-2022
Case filed
Registration No. 110/2022
Case Summary: Civil Suit No. 110/2022 Defendant No. 1's application to set aside the "No Written Statement" order was allowed. The court found that while the defendant failed to file his written statement within the stipulated period, his reasons for delay—unavailability of old revenue documents—were credible as claimed under affidavit. The court set aside the No Written Statement order and permitted defendant No. 1's written statement to be taken on record, applying principles of natural justice and fair opportunity. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts