Sanjeevani Gramin Bigar Sheti Sahakari Pathsanstha Marya Kotoli Tarfe Clerk Vijay Anant Kulkarni vs Aananda Ganpati Patil — 350/2025
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Status: Awaiting Summons. Next hearing: 14th July 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHKO170004872025
Next Hearing
14th July 2026
e-Filing Number
03-04-2025
Filing Number
402/2025
Filing Date
03-04-2025
Registration No
350/2025
Registration Date
03-04-2025
Court
Civil and Criminal Court , Panhala
Judge
2-C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Panhala
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sanjeevani Gramin Bigar Sheti Sahakari Pathsanstha Marya Kotoli Tarfe Clerk Vijay Anant Kulkarni
Adv. V. A. Patil
Respondent(s)
Aananda Ganpati Patil
Hearing History
Judge: 2-C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Panhala
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 19-05-2026 | Awaiting Summons |
| 16-03-2026 | Awaiting Summons |
| 11-02-2026 | Awaiting Summons |
| 22-12-2025 | Awaiting Summons |
| 04-11-2025 | Awaiting Summons |
Interim Orders
Summary of Case 350/2025 The JMFC Panhala issued process against accused Aananda Ganpati Patil for offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The court found prima facie evidence that a cheque given by the accused towards a legally enforceable debt was dishonoured; the complainant served mandatory notice demanding payment within 15 days, which the accused failed to comply with. All supporting documents and witness list were filed on record. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary of Case 350/2025 The JMFC Panhala issued process against accused Aananda Ganpati Patil for offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The court found prima facie evidence that a cheque given by the accused towards a legally enforceable debt was dishonoured; the complainant served mandatory notice demanding payment within 15 days, which the accused failed to comply with. All supporting documents and witness list were filed on record. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts