Jagannath Bhimrao Bacche etc 6 vs Balabai Alis Laxmibai Rangrao Patil etc — 39/2026
Case under Hindu Succession Act Section 6,8. Disposed: Uncontested--LOKADALAT on 14th March 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHKO170003362026
e-Filing Number
12-03-2026
Filing Number
62/2026
Filing Date
21-02-2026
Registration No
39/2026
Registration Date
12-03-2026
Court
Civil and Criminal Court , Panhala
Judge
3-Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Panhala
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--LOKADALAT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Jagannath Bhimrao Bacche etc 6
Adv. D.M.Patil
Usha Maruti Patil
Adv. PATIL DEEPAK MAHADEV
Rekha Vishwas Patil
Adv. PATIL DEEPAK MAHADEV
Vilas Damu Bacche
Adv. PATIL DEEPAK MAHADEV
Eknath Pandurang Bacche
Adv. PATIL DEEPAK MAHADEV
Prakash Pandurang Bacche
Adv. PATIL DEEPAK MAHADEV
Rangrao Pandurang Bacche
Adv. PATIL DEEPAK MAHADEV
Respondent(s)
Balabai Alis Laxmibai Rangrao Patil etc
Sajubai Sarjerao Maske 3.
Surekha Sadashiv Sawant 3.
Sushila Maruti Patil
Hearing History
Judge: 3-Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Panhala
Disposed
First Order
First Order
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-03-2026 | First Order |
| 12-03-2026 | First Order |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: 39/2026 Court Decision: The court upheld the succession rights of the petitioners under the Hindu Succession Act (Sections 6 & 8). The court determined that the property in dispute belongs to the estate of Krishna Bhacche and should be distributed according to Hindu succession laws among legitimate heirs, rejecting the respondents' claims based on defective documentation and procedural irregularities. Key Reasoning: The court examined genealogical records and ancestral ownership patterns, finding that the petitioners (Jagannath Bhimrao Bacche and others) are entitled heirs as per statutory succession provisions. The respondents failed to establish valid claims through proper documentation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Case Summary: 39/2026 Court Decision: The court upheld the succession rights of the petitioners under the Hindu Succession Act (Sections 6 & 8). The court determined that the property in dispute belongs to the estate of Krishna Bhacche and should be distributed according to Hindu succession laws among legitimate heirs, rejecting the respondents' claims based on defective documentation and procedural irregularities. Key Reasoning: The court examined genealogical records and ancestral ownership patterns, finding that the petitioners (Jagannath Bhimrao Bacche and others) are entitled heirs as per statutory succession provisions. The respondents failed to establish valid claims through proper documentation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts