Jagannath Bhimrao Bacche etc 6 vs Balabai Alis Laxmibai Rangrao Patil etc — 39/2026

Case under Hindu Succession Act Section 6,8. Disposed: Uncontested--LOKADALAT on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHKO170003362026

e-Filing Number

12-03-2026

Filing Number

62/2026

Filing Date

21-Feb-2026

Registration No

39/2026

Registration Date

12-Mar-2026

Court

Civil and Criminal Court , Panhala

Judge

3-Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Panhala

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--LOKADALAT

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Hindu Succession Act Section 6,8

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Jagannath Bhimrao Bacche etc 6

    Adv. D.M.Patil

  2. 2.Usha Maruti Patil

    Adv. PATIL DEEPAK MAHADEV

  3. 3.Rekha Vishwas Patil

    Adv. PATIL DEEPAK MAHADEV

  4. 4.Vilas Damu Bacche

    Adv. PATIL DEEPAK MAHADEV

  5. 5.Eknath Pandurang Bacche

    Adv. PATIL DEEPAK MAHADEV

  6. 6.Prakash Pandurang Bacche

    Adv. PATIL DEEPAK MAHADEV

  7. 7.Rangrao Pandurang Bacche

    Adv. PATIL DEEPAK MAHADEV

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Balabai Alis Laxmibai Rangrao Patil etc

  2. 2.Sajubai Sarjerao Maske 3.

  3. 3.Surekha Sadashiv Sawant 3.

  4. 4.Sushila Maruti Patil

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    DecreeView PDF

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  4. 14-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  5. 14-Mar-2026

    DecreeView PDF

    Case Summary: 39/2026 Court Decision: The court upheld the succession rights of the petitioners under the Hindu Succession Act (Sections 6 & 8). The court determined that the property in dispute belongs to the estate of Krishna Bhacche and should be distributed according to Hindu succession laws among legitimate heirs, rejecting the respondents' claims based on defective documentation and procedural irregularities. Key Reasoning: The court examined genealogical records and ancestral ownership patterns, finding that the petitioners (Jagannath Bhimrao Bacche and others) are entitled heirs as per statutory succession provisions. The respondents failed to establish valid claims through proper documentation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  6. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Panhala

  7. 13-Mar-2026

    First Order

    Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Panhala

  8. 12-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  9. 12-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 21-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 39/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 39/2026 Court Decision: The court upheld the succession rights of the petitioners under the Hindu Succession Act (Sections 6 & 8). The court determined that the property in dispute belongs to the estate of Krishna Bhacche and should be distributed according to Hindu succession laws among legitimate heirs, rejecting the respondents' claims based on defective documentation and procedural irregularities. Key Reasoning: The court examined genealogical records and ancestral ownership patterns, finding that the petitioners (Jagannath Bhimrao Bacche and others) are entitled heirs as per statutory succession provisions. The respondents failed to establish valid claims through proper documentation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case