State Of Maharashtra vs Santosh Dhulaji Mane — 219/2026

Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section 184. Disposed: Uncontested--LOKADALAT on 14th March 2026.

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHKO170003152026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

10-03-2026

Filing Number

268/2026

Filing Date

10-03-2026

Registration No

219/2026

Registration Date

10-03-2026

Court

Civil and Criminal Court , Panhala

Judge

2-C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Panhala

Decision Date

14th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--LOKADALAT

FIR Details

FIR Number

31

Police Station

Panhala Police Station

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

MOTOR VEHICLES ACT Section 184
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 281

Petitioner(s)

State Of Maharashtra

Adv. Sumitra Suryabhan Garje

Respondent(s)

Santosh Dhulaji Mane

Hearing History

Judge: 2-C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Panhala

14-03-2026

Disposed

10-03-2026

Lok-Nyayalaya

Final Orders / Judgements

14-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

Case Summary The Judicial Magistrate convicted Santosh Dhulaji Mane for rash/negligent driving under Section 281 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Section 184 of the Motor Vehicles Act, after he voluntarily pleaded guilty to driving his motorcycle in a manner endangering human life on 28.02.2026. The court sentenced him to pay Rs. 500 fine (3 days imprisonment in default) for the first offense and Rs. 1,000 fine (3 days imprisonment in default) for the second offense, considering it his first offense and his age as mitigating factors. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary The Judicial Magistrate convicted Santosh Dhulaji Mane for rash/negligent driving under Section 281 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Section 184 of the Motor Vehicles Act, after he voluntarily pleaded guilty to driving his motorcycle in a manner endangering human life on 28.02.2026. The court sentenced him to pay Rs. 500 fine (3 days imprisonment in default) for the first offense and Rs. 1,000 fine (3 days imprisonment in default) for the second offense, considering it his first offense and his age as mitigating factors. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Civil and Criminal Court , Panhala All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case