State Of Maharashtra vs Santosh Dhulaji Mane — 219/2026
Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section 184. Disposed: Uncontested--LOKADALAT on 14th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHKO170003152026
e-Filing Number
10-03-2026
Filing Number
268/2026
Filing Date
10-Mar-2026
Registration No
219/2026
Registration Date
10-Mar-2026
Court
Civil and Criminal Court , Panhala
Judge
2-C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Panhala
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--LOKADALAT
Last updated 11-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
31
Police Station
Panhala Police Station
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State Of Maharashtra
Adv. Sumitra Suryabhan Garje
Respondent(s)
-
1.Santosh Dhulaji Mane
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Case Summary The Judicial Magistrate convicted Santosh Dhulaji Mane for rash/negligent driving under Section 281 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Section 184 of the Motor Vehicles Act, after he voluntarily pleaded guilty to driving his motorcycle in a manner endangering human life on 28.02.2026. The court sentenced him to pay Rs. 500 fine (3 days imprisonment in default) for the first offense and Rs. 1,000 fine (3 days imprisonment in default) for the second offense, considering it his first offense and his age as mitigating factors. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Panhala
-
10-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
10-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 219/2026
Case Summary The Judicial Magistrate convicted Santosh Dhulaji Mane for rash/negligent driving under Section 281 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Section 184 of the Motor Vehicles Act, after he voluntarily pleaded guilty to driving his motorcycle in a manner endangering human life on 28.02.2026. The court sentenced him to pay Rs. 500 fine (3 days imprisonment in default) for the first offense and Rs. 1,000 fine (3 days imprisonment in default) for the second offense, considering it his first offense and his age as mitigating factors. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts