Vikas Sadashiv Teli (Phalle) vs Ananda Sadashiv Teli (Phalle) — 29/2026

Case under Hindu Succession Act Section 6,8. Disposed: Uncontested--LOKADALAT on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHKO170003122026

e-Filing Number

10-03-2026

Filing Number

51/2026

Filing Date

10-Mar-2026

Registration No

29/2026

Registration Date

10-Mar-2026

Court

Civil and Criminal Court , Panhala

Judge

3-Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Panhala

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--LOKADALAT

Last updated 11-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Hindu Succession Act Section 6,8

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Vikas Sadashiv Teli (Phalle)

    Adv. M. N. Davang

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Ananda Sadashiv Teli (Phalle)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    DecreeView PDF

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  4. 14-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  5. 14-Mar-2026

    DecreeView PDF

    Summary The court decided a property dispute case involving land in Panhaala, Kolhapur district. The court found that the plaintiff (defendant in counter-claim) failed to prove valid ownership of the disputed property and ordered him to pay Rs. 13,60 rupees to the defendant as compensation, while dismissing the plaintiff's claims for lack of sufficient evidence and proper documentation of land rights. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  6. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Panhala

  7. 10-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  8. 10-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 10-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 29/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court decided a property dispute case involving land in Panhaala, Kolhapur district. The court found that the plaintiff (defendant in counter-claim) failed to prove valid ownership of the disputed property and ordered him to pay Rs. 13,60 rupees to the defendant as compensation, while dismissing the plaintiff's claims for lack of sufficient evidence and proper documentation of land rights. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case