Sanjay Pandurang Ingale etc 3 vs None — 12/2026

Case under Bombay Regulation Act,1827 Section 2. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 11th June 2026.

Arguments Next hearing 11-Jun-2026 this date has passed

Civil M.A. - Civil Misc. Application

CNR: MHKO170002952026

e-Filing Number

04-03-2026

Filing Number

46/2026

Filing Date

05-Mar-2026

Registration No

12/2026

Registration Date

05-Mar-2026

Court

Civil and Criminal Court , Panhala

Judge

2-C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Panhala

Last updated 11-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Bombay Regulation Act,1827 Section 2

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Sanjay Pandurang Ingale etc 3

    Adv. V. H. Chavare

  2. 2.Raju Pandurang Ingale

    Adv. CHAVARE VASANT HINDURAO

  3. 3.Mangal Pandurang Ingale

    Adv. CHAVARE VASANT HINDURAO

  4. 4.Pandurang Hindurav Ingale

    Adv. CHAVARE VASANT HINDURAO

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.None

Case History

  1. 11-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 08-May-2026

    Arguments

    C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Panhala

  3. 30-Apr-2026

    Arguments

    C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Panhala

  4. 28-Apr-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    The application is dismissed. The court found that after examining the record, the proposed amendment is legally untenable and does not cure the defects in the original case, and therefore refuses to allow any further applications on this matter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  5. 28-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Panhala

  6. 24-Apr-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  7. 24-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Panhala

  8. 10-Mar-2026

    Proclomation

    C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Panhala

  9. 05-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  10. 05-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  11. 05-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 12/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The application is dismissed. The court found that after examining the record, the proposed amendment is legally untenable and does not cure the defects in the original case, and therefore refuses to allow any further applications on this matter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case