Baburao Daji Nikam etc 1 vs Abhishekh Manik Shingate etc — 34/2025
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 26,38,39. Status: Filing of Say on Exh___Unready. Next hearing: 15th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHKO170002682025
Next Hearing
15th June 2026
e-Filing Number
24-02-2025
Filing Number
56/2025
Filing Date
24-02-2025
Registration No
34/2025
Registration Date
24-02-2025
Court
Civil and Criminal Court , Panhala
Judge
3-Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Panhala
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Baburao Daji Nikam etc 1
Adv. K. K. Sasawade
Shankar Daji Nikam
Respondent(s)
Abhishekh Manik Shingate etc
Aniket Manik Shingate
Hearing History
Judge: 3-Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Panhala
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Issues
Issues
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-04-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready |
| 10-03-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready |
| 05-02-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready |
| 04-12-2025 | Issues |
| 16-10-2025 | Issues |
Interim Orders
Summary This is a civil court order from Panhala (Maharashtra) dated 08.05.2025 in a property possession dispute (Case No. 34/2025). The court granted the plaintiff's interim relief (temporary injunction) petition with costs, allowing him to retain possession of the disputed agricultural property (Plot No. 829, Part 9). The court simultaneously vacated an earlier ex-parte order dated 25.02.2025 that had been passed against the plaintiff. The judgment found the plaintiff had legitimate claims to peaceful possession and rejected the defendant's allegations of encroachment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary This is a civil court order from Panhala (Maharashtra) dated 08.05.2025 in a property possession dispute (Case No. 34/2025). The court granted the plaintiff's interim relief (temporary injunction) petition with costs, allowing him to retain possession of the disputed agricultural property (Plot No. 829, Part 9). The court simultaneously vacated an earlier ex-parte order dated 25.02.2025 that had been passed against the plaintiff. The judgment found the plaintiff had legitimate claims to peaceful possession and rejected the defendant's allegations of encroachment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts