Baburao Daji Nikam etc 1 vs Abhishekh Manik Shingate etc — 34/2025

Case under Specific Relief Act Section 26,38,39. Status: Filing of Say on Exh___Unready. Next hearing: 15th June 2026.

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHKO170002682025

Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

Next Hearing

15th June 2026

e-Filing Number

24-02-2025

Filing Number

56/2025

Filing Date

24-02-2025

Registration No

34/2025

Registration Date

24-02-2025

Court

Civil and Criminal Court , Panhala

Judge

3-Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Panhala

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section 26,38,39

Petitioner(s)

Baburao Daji Nikam etc 1

Adv. K. K. Sasawade

Shankar Daji Nikam

Respondent(s)

Abhishekh Manik Shingate etc

Aniket Manik Shingate

Hearing History

Judge: 3-Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Panhala

13-04-2026

Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

10-03-2026

Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

05-02-2026

Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

04-12-2025

Issues

16-10-2025

Issues

Interim Orders

08-05-2025
Order on Exhibit

Summary This is a civil court order from Panhala (Maharashtra) dated 08.05.2025 in a property possession dispute (Case No. 34/2025). The court granted the plaintiff's interim relief (temporary injunction) petition with costs, allowing him to retain possession of the disputed agricultural property (Plot No. 829, Part 9). The court simultaneously vacated an earlier ex-parte order dated 25.02.2025 that had been passed against the plaintiff. The judgment found the plaintiff had legitimate claims to peaceful possession and rejected the defendant's allegations of encroachment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary This is a civil court order from Panhala (Maharashtra) dated 08.05.2025 in a property possession dispute (Case No. 34/2025). The court granted the plaintiff's interim relief (temporary injunction) petition with costs, allowing him to retain possession of the disputed agricultural property (Plot No. 829, Part 9). The court simultaneously vacated an earlier ex-parte order dated 25.02.2025 that had been passed against the plaintiff. The judgment found the plaintiff had legitimate claims to peaceful possession and rejected the defendant's allegations of encroachment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil and Criminal Court , Panhala All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case