State Of Maharashtra vs Amar Pandurang Angthekar etc — 157/2026

Case under Maharashtra Prevention of Gambling Act Section 12(a). Status: Hearing. Next hearing: 04th July 2026.

Hearing Next hearing 04-Jul-2026 this date has passed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHKO170002312026

e-Filing Number

21-02-2026

Filing Number

195/2026

Filing Date

21-Feb-2026

Registration No

157/2026

Registration Date

21-Feb-2026

Court

Civil and Criminal Court , Panhala

Judge

2-C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Panhala

Last updated 15-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

14

Police Station

Panhala Police Station

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Prevention of Gambling Act Section 12(a)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State Of Maharashtra

    Adv. Sumitra Suryabhan Garje

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Amar Pandurang Angthekar etc

  2. 2.Ketan Krushnat Sawant

Case History

  1. 04-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 18-May-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Case Summary: State Of Maharashtra v/s Amar Pandurang Angthekar (157/2026) The application for release of a seized ITEL mobile phone (valued at Rs.7,000) was allowed. The court found the applicant to be the rightful owner based on submitted receipt and Aadhar card, rejecting the IO's objection that release might facilitate future offences. The mobile was ordered released upon execution of an indemnity bond of Rs.7,000, with conditions: applicant cannot sell or alter the device during trial, must produce it as required by court, and the IO must photograph it for the chargesheet. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-May-2026

    Hearing

    C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Panhala

  4. 13-May-2026

    Hearing

    C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Panhala

  5. 08-May-2026

    Hearing

    C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Panhala

  6. 04-May-2026

    Hearing

    C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Panhala

  7. 06-Apr-2026

    Hearing

    C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Panhala

  8. 16-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Panhala

  9. 06-Mar-2026

    Awaiting Summons

    C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Panhala

  10. 21-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  11. 21-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 157/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: State Of Maharashtra v/s Amar Pandurang Angthekar (157/2026) The application for release of a seized ITEL mobile phone (valued at Rs.7,000) was allowed. The court found the applicant to be the rightful owner based on submitted receipt and Aadhar card, rejecting the IO's objection that release might facilitate future offences. The mobile was ordered released upon execution of an indemnity bond of Rs.7,000, with conditions: applicant cannot sell or alter the device during trial, must produce it as required by court, and the IO must photograph it for the chargesheet. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case