Shahaji Ganpati Patil vs None — 6/2024
Case under Bombay Regulation Act,1827 Section Viii. Status: Filing of Say on Exh___Unready. Next hearing: 09th June 2026.
Civil M.A. - Civil Misc. Application
CNR: MHKO170001802024
Next Hearing
09th June 2026
e-Filing Number
01-02-2024
Filing Number
19/2024
Filing Date
01-02-2024
Registration No
6/2024
Registration Date
01-02-2024
Court
Civil and Criminal Court , Panhala
Judge
3-Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Panhala
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Shahaji Ganpati Patil
Adv. S. A. Sangar
Respondent(s)
None
Hearing History
Judge: 3-Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Panhala
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
Filing of Say on Exh___Unready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 05-05-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready |
| 21-04-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready |
| 10-03-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready |
| 17-02-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready |
| 10-02-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Unready |
Interim Orders
Court Order Summary Case: Civil Miscellaneous Petition No. 6/2024, Panhala Court (Maharashtra) Outcome: The petition filed by a third party (Balvant Tukaram Patil) seeking to be impleaded as a party in the civil succession case has been dismissed with costs. The court found that the third party failed to establish sufficient legal grounds or credible evidence of being a legal heir under the Hindu Succession Act, Class II, and determined that the petitioner lacked proper standing to intervene in the proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Order Summary Case: Civil Miscellaneous Petition No. 6/2024, Panhala Court (Maharashtra) Outcome: The petition filed by a third party (Balvant Tukaram Patil) seeking to be impleaded as a party in the civil succession case has been dismissed with costs. The court found that the third party failed to establish sufficient legal grounds or credible evidence of being a legal heir under the Hindu Succession Act, Class II, and determined that the petitioner lacked proper standing to intervene in the proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts