Chaitrali Sunil Shinde vs Shri Madhukar Narayan Patil Advocate - B. S. Ambekar — 13/2018
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 38. Status: Defence Evidence. Next hearing: 20th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHKO170001282018
Filing Number
18/2018
Filing Date
23-Jan-2018
Registration No
13/2018
Registration Date
23-Jan-2018
Court
Civil and Criminal Court , Panhala
Judge
2-C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Panhala
Last updated 15-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Chaitrali Sunil Shinde
Adv. S M Gholap
Respondent(s)
-
1.Shri Madhukar Narayan Patil Advocate - B. S. Ambekar
-
2.Koyanabai Keshav Patil
-
3.Nirmala Dileep Patil
-
4.Aashish Dileep Patil
-
5.Amit Dileep Patil
-
6.Dipak Keshav Patil
-
7.Sarjerao Rangrao Jadhav
Case History
-
20-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
23-Apr-2026
Defence Evidence
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Panhala
-
04-Apr-2026
Defence Evidence
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Panhala
-
16-Mar-2026
Defence Evidence
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Panhala
-
21-Feb-2026
Defence Evidence
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Panhala
-
31-Jan-2026
Defence Evidence
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Panhala
-
17-Jan-2026
Defence Evidence
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Panhala
-
20-Dec-2025
Defence Evidence
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Panhala
-
06-Dec-2025
Defence Evidence
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Panhala
-
15-Nov-2025
Defence Evidence
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Panhala
-
18-Oct-2025
Defence Evidence
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Panhala
-
04-Oct-2025
Defence Evidence
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Panhala
-
20-Sep-2025
Defence Evidence
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Panhala
-
14-Aug-2025
Defence Evidence
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Panhala
-
19-Jul-2025
Defence Evidence
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Panhala
-
21-Jun-2025
Defence Evidence
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Panhala
-
19-Apr-2025
Defence Evidence
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Panhala
-
15-Mar-2025
Evidence Part Heard
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Panhala
-
01-Mar-2025
Evidence Part Heard
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Panhala
-
15-Feb-2025
Evidence Part Heard
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Panhala
-
18-Jan-2025
Evidence Part Heard
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Panhala
-
21-Dec-2024
Evidence Part Heard
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Panhala
-
16-Nov-2024
Evidence Part Heard
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Panhala
-
19-Oct-2024
Evidence Part Heard
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Panhala
-
21-Sep-2024
Evidence Part Heard
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Panhala
-
17-Aug-2024
Evidence Part Heard
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Panhala
-
20-Jul-2024
Hearing
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Panhala
-
15-Jun-2024
Hearing
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Panhala
-
16-Mar-2024
Hearing
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Panhala
-
17-Feb-2024
Hearing
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Panhala
-
20-Jan-2024
Hearing
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Panhala
-
29-Nov-2023
Hearing
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Panhala
-
18-Oct-2023
Hearing
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Panhala
-
04-Oct-2023
Hearing
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Panhala
-
06-Sep-2023
Hearing
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Panhala
-
09-Aug-2023
Hearing
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Panhala
-
28-Jun-2023
Hearing
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Panhala
-
25-Apr-2023
Hearing
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Panhala
-
21-Mar-2023
Evidence
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Panhala
-
13-Feb-2023
Evidence
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Panhala
-
15-Dec-2022
Evidence
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Panhala
-
21-Nov-2022
Evidence
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Panhala
-
29-Sep-2022
Steps_Unready
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Panhala
-
22-Aug-2022
Appearance
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Panhala
-
18-Jul-2022
Appearance
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Panhala
-
21-Jun-2022
Appearance
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Panhala
-
25-Apr-2022
Awaiting Summons
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Panhala
-
21-Mar-2022
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Case Summary: Chaitrali Shinde vs. Madhukar Patil (13/2018) The court allowed the plaintiff's application to add six proposed persons (1-6) as necessary parties to the civil suit. The judge found these parties necessary to avoid multiplicity of proceedings and reach a reasoned decision. The plaintiff was directed to carry out the necessary amendment to the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
21-Mar-2022
Argument on Exh.____Ready
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Panhala
-
24-Jan-2022
Argument on Exh.____Ready
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Panhala
-
13-Dec-2021
Argument on Exh.____Ready
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Panhala
-
22-Nov-2021
Argument on Exh.____Ready
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Panhala
-
28-Oct-2021
Argument on Exh.____Ready
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Panhala
-
14-Sep-2021
Argument on Exh.____Ready
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Panhala
-
09-Aug-2021
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Panhala
-
05-Jul-2021
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Panhala
-
17-Apr-2021
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Panhala
-
22-Mar-2021
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Panhala
-
22-Feb-2021
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Panhala
-
01-Feb-2021
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Panhala
-
04-Jan-2021
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Panhala
-
14-Dec-2020
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Panhala
-
21-Sep-2020
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Panhala
-
04-Aug-2020
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Panhala
-
21-Jul-2020
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Panhala
-
09-Jun-2020
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Panhala
-
20-Apr-2020
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Panhala
-
23-Mar-2020
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Panhala
-
06-Jan-2020
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Panhala
-
09-Sep-2019
Hearing
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Panhala
-
15-Jul-2019
Hearing
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Panhala
-
18-Mar-2019
List of Witness
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Panhala
-
21-Jan-2019
Issues
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Panhala
-
26-Nov-2018
Written Statement
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Panhala
-
10-Sep-2018
Steps
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Panhala
-
09-Jul-2018
Steps
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Panhala
-
23-Apr-2018
Steps
C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Panhala
-
26-Feb-2018
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
23-Jan-2018
Case filed
Registration No. 13/2018
Case Summary: Chaitrali Shinde vs. Madhukar Patil (13/2018) The court allowed the plaintiff's application to add six proposed persons (1-6) as necessary parties to the civil suit. The judge found these parties necessary to avoid multiplicity of proceedings and reach a reasoned decision. The plaintiff was directed to carry out the necessary amendment to the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts