Sarvagram Fincare Pvt Ltd vs Gayatri Mahesh Patekari — 63/2026

Case under Negotiable Instruments (Amendment) Act Section 138. Status: Verification. Next hearing: 22nd July 2026.

Verification Next hearing 22-Jul-2026 this date has passed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHKO170001142026

e-Filing Number

02-02-2026

Filing Number

89/2026

Filing Date

02-Feb-2026

Registration No

63/2026

Registration Date

02-Feb-2026

Court

Civil and Criminal Court , Panhala

Judge

3-Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Panhala

Last updated 15-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments (Amendment) Act Section 138

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Sarvagram Fincare Pvt Ltd

    Adv. GAIKWAD SWAROOP MANOHAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Gayatri Mahesh Patekari

Case History

  1. 22-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 18-May-2026

    Verification

    Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Panhala

  3. 16-Mar-2026

    Verification

    Joint C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Panhala

  4. 02-Feb-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Case Summary: Sarvagram Fincare Pvt Ltd v. Gayatri Mahesh Patekari (63/2026) The court issued process against the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The complainant-company established prima facie that a cheque given by the accused towards a legally enforceable debt was dishonoured for insufficient funds, and despite receiving a mandatory 15-day notice, the accused failed to make payment. The Judicial Magistrate found all essential ingredients of the offence established and ordered process to be issued against the accused under Section 227(1)(a) of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita 2023. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  5. 02-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 02-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 63/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Sarvagram Fincare Pvt Ltd v. Gayatri Mahesh Patekari (63/2026) The court issued process against the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The complainant-company established prima facie that a cheque given by the accused towards a legally enforceable debt was dishonoured for insufficient funds, and despite receiving a mandatory 15-day notice, the accused failed to make payment. The Judicial Magistrate found all essential ingredients of the offence established and ordered process to be issued against the accused under Section 227(1)(a) of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita 2023. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case