Vitthal Dattatray patil vs Sakharam Tukaram Patil — 1/2023

Case under Specific Relief Act Section 6. Status: Filing of Say on Exh___Ready. Next hearing: 20th July 2026.

Filing of Say on Exh___Ready Next hearing 20-Jul-2026 this date has passed

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHKO160009752022

Filing Number

271/2022

Filing Date

31-Dec-2022

Registration No

1/2023

Registration Date

06-Jan-2023

Court

Civil and Criminal Court , Malkapur Shauwadi

Judge

3-Joint Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Malkapur-Shahuwadi

Last updated 26-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section 6

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Vitthal Dattatray patil

    Adv. V. V. Bambawadekar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Sakharam Tukaram Patil

  2. 2.Ishwara Tukaram Patil(Legal Heir)

  3. 3.vasant Tukaram Patil(Legal Heir)

  4. 4.Babu Dnyanu Patil

  5. 5.Sunil Baburao Patil

  6. 6.Namdev Shamrao Patil

  7. 7.Sadshiv Dnyanu Patil

  8. 8.Sakharam Rama patil(Legal Heir)

  9. 9.Lakshaman Anna @Ganapati Patil

  10. 10.Ramchandra Anna @ Ganapati Patil

  11. 11.Baliram Shamrao Patil

  12. 12.Shrirang Shamrao Patil

  13. 13.Pandurang Shamrao Patil

Case History

  1. 20-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 11-Jun-2026

    Filing of Say on Exh___Ready

    Joint Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Malkapur-Shahuwadi

  3. 07-May-2026

    Filing of Say on Exh___Ready

    Joint Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Malkapur-Shahuwadi

  4. 15-Apr-2026

    Filing of Say on Exh___Ready

    Joint Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Malkapur-Shahuwadi

  5. 23-Mar-2026

    Filing of Say on Exh___Ready

    Joint Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Malkapur-Shahuwadi

  6. 02-Mar-2026

    Filing of Say on Exh___Ready

    Joint Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Malkapur-Shahuwadi

  7. 23-Feb-2026

    Filing of Say on Exh___Ready

    Joint Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Malkapur-Shahuwadi

  8. 17-Feb-2026

    Filing of Say on Exh___Ready

    Joint Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Malkapur-Shahuwadi

  9. 19-Jan-2026

    Filing of Say on Exh___Ready

    Joint Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Malkapur-Shahuwadi

  10. 09-Dec-2025

    Filing of Say on Exh___Ready

    Joint Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Malkapur-Shahuwadi

  11. 27-Nov-2025

    Issues

    Joint Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Malkapur-Shahuwadi

  12. 27-Oct-2025

    W.S. and Say

    Joint Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Malkapur-Shahuwadi

  13. 29-Sep-2025

    W.S. and Say

    Joint Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Malkapur-Shahuwadi

  14. 04-Sep-2025

    W.S. and Say

    Joint Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Malkapur-Shahuwadi

  15. 07-Aug-2025

    W.S. and Say

    Joint Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Malkapur-Shahuwadi

  16. 27-Jun-2025

    W.S. and Say

    Joint Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Malkapur-Shahuwadi

  17. 09-May-2025

    Order on Exhibit

    Case Summary: Vitthal Dattatray Patil v. Sakharam Tukaram Patil (Case 1/2023) Outcome: The petition for temporary injunction (Order 15, Rule 51) was dismissed/rejected. Key Facts: Vitthal Dattatray Patil, an adoptee of Dattu Narayan Patil (deceased), filed a suit claiming 0.0463 acres of land in Group 45, Moze Karjoshi, Kolhapur district. He alleged that respondents (co-heirs/legal heirs) encroached upon 0.01 acres of his property. He sought a temporary order restraining construction on the encroached land pending final judgment. Court's Reasoning: The court found that the petitioner failed to establish a prima facie case or balance of convenience in his favor. The disputed property boundaries lacked clear delineation, and the encroached area's exact location and responsibility remained contested between parties. The court noted that determining actual encroachment would require final trial proceedings, making immediate injunction unjustified. Date: May 9, 2025 This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  18. 09-May-2025

    W.S. and Say

    Joint Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Malkapur-Shahuwadi

  19. 08-May-2025

    W.S. and Say

    Joint Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Malkapur-Shahuwadi

  20. 07-May-2025

    W.S. and Say

    Joint Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Malkapur-Shahuwadi

  21. 06-May-2025

    W.S. and Say

    Joint Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Malkapur-Shahuwadi

  22. 05-May-2025

    W.S. and Say

    Joint Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Malkapur-Shahuwadi

  23. 28-Apr-2025

    W.S. and Say

    Joint Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Malkapur-Shahuwadi

  24. 22-Apr-2025

    Order on Exhibit

  25. 22-Apr-2025

    W.S. and Say

    Joint Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Malkapur-Shahuwadi

  26. 21-Apr-2025

    W.S. and Say

    Joint Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Malkapur-Shahuwadi

  27. 15-Apr-2025

    W.S. and Say

    Joint Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Malkapur-Shahuwadi

  28. 04-Apr-2025

    Order on Exhibit

  29. 04-Apr-2025

    W.S. and Say

    Joint Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Malkapur-Shahuwadi

  30. 03-Apr-2025

    W.S. and Say

    Joint Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Malkapur-Shahuwadi

  31. 11-Mar-2025

    W.S. and Say

    Joint Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Malkapur-Shahuwadi

  32. 17-Feb-2025

    W.S. and Say

    Joint Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Malkapur-Shahuwadi

  33. 16-Jan-2025

    W.S. and Say

    Joint Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Malkapur-Shahuwadi

  34. 16-Dec-2024

    W.S. and Say

    Joint Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Malkapur-Shahuwadi

  35. 07-Nov-2024

    W.S. and Say

    Joint Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Malkapur-Shahuwadi

  36. 17-Oct-2024

    W.S. and Say

    Joint Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Malkapur-Shahuwadi

  37. 07-Oct-2024

    W.S. and Say

    Joint Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Malkapur-Shahuwadi

  38. 23-Sep-2024

    W.S. and Say

    Joint Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Malkapur-Shahuwadi

  39. 19-Sep-2024

    Report

    Joint Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Malkapur-Shahuwadi

  40. 05-Sep-2024

    Report

    Joint Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Malkapur-Shahuwadi

  41. 22-Aug-2024

    Report

    Joint Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Malkapur-Shahuwadi

  42. 08-Aug-2024

    Report

    Joint Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Malkapur-Shahuwadi

  43. 01-Aug-2024

    Report

    Joint Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Malkapur-Shahuwadi

  44. 29-Jul-2024

    Report

    Joint Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Malkapur-Shahuwadi

  45. 16-Jul-2024

    Report

    Joint Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Malkapur-Shahuwadi

  46. 11-Jul-2024

    Report

    Joint Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Malkapur-Shahuwadi

  47. 19-Jun-2024

    Report

    Joint Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Malkapur-Shahuwadi

  48. 24-Apr-2024

    Report

    Joint Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Malkapur-Shahuwadi

  49. 21-Mar-2024

    Report

    Joint Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Malkapur-Shahuwadi

  50. 08-Feb-2024

    Report

    Joint Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Malkapur-Shahuwadi

  51. 16-Jan-2024

    Report

    Joint Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Malkapur-Shahuwadi

  52. 13-Dec-2023

    Report

    Joint Civil Judge Jr. Dn. Malkapur-Shahuwadi

  53. 11-Oct-2023

    Report

    Civil Judge Junior Division Malkapur-Shahuwadi.

  54. 09-Aug-2023

    Report

    Civil Judge Junior Division Malkapur-Shahuwadi.

  55. 03-Jul-2023

    Order on Exhibit

  56. 03-Jul-2023

    Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready

    Civil Judge Junior Division Malkapur-Shahuwadi.

  57. 28-Jun-2023

    Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready

    Civil Judge Junior Division Malkapur-Shahuwadi.

  58. 20-Apr-2023

    Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready

    Civil Judge Junior Division Malkapur-Shahuwadi.

  59. 29-Mar-2023

    Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready

    Civil Judge Junior Division Malkapur-Shahuwadi.

  60. 01-Mar-2023

    Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready

    Civil Judge Junior Division Malkapur-Shahuwadi.

  61. 15-Feb-2023

    Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready

    Civil Judge Junior Division Malkapur-Shahuwadi.

  62. 06-Jan-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  63. 31-Dec-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Vitthal Dattatray Patil v. Sakharam Tukaram Patil (Case 1/2023) Outcome: The petition for temporary injunction (Order 15, Rule 51) was dismissed/rejected. Key Facts: Vitthal Dattatray Patil, an adoptee of Dattu Narayan Patil (deceased), filed a suit claiming 0.0463 acres of land in Group 45, Moze Karjoshi, Kolhapur district. He alleged that respondents (co-heirs/legal heirs) encroached upon 0.01 acres of his property. He sought a temporary order restraining construction on the encroached land pending final judgment. Court's Reasoning: The court found that the petitioner failed to establish a prima facie case or balance of convenience in his favor. The disputed property boundaries lacked clear delineation, and the encroached area's exact location and responsibility remained contested between parties. The court noted that determining actual encroachment would require final trial proceedings, making immediate injunction unjustified. Date: May 9, 2025 This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case